Literature DB >> 19382175

Refinement of the primary hydration shell model for molecular dynamics simulations of large proteins.

Mehdi Bagheri Hamaneh1, Matthias Buck.   

Abstract

A realistic representation of water molecules is important in molecular dynamics simulation of proteins. However, the standard method of solvating biomolecules, that is, immersing them in a box of water with periodic boundary conditions, is computationally expensive. The primary hydration shell (PHS) method, developed more than a decade ago and implemented in CHARMM, uses only a thin shell of water around the system of interest, and so greatly reduces the computational cost of simulations. Applying the PHS method, especially to larger proteins, revealed that further optimization and a partial reworking was required and here we present several improvements to its performance. The model is applied to systems with different sizes, and both water and protein behaviors are compared with those observed in standard simulations with periodic boundary conditions and, in some cases, with experimental data. The advantages of the modified PHS method over its original implementation are clearly apparent when it is applied to simulating the 82 kDa protein Malate Synthase G. (c) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19382175      PMCID: PMC2760659          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  11 in total

1.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

2.  Towards molecular dynamics simulation of large proteins with a hydration shell at constant pressure.

Authors:  V Lounnas; S K Lüdemann; R C Wade
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  1999-04-05       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs.

Authors:  David A Case; Thomas E Cheatham; Tom Darden; Holger Gohlke; Ray Luo; Kenneth M Merz; Alexey Onufriev; Carlos Simmerling; Bing Wang; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Elastic bag model for molecular dynamics simulations of solvated systems: application to liquid argon.

Authors:  Yuhui Li; Goran Krilov; B J Berne
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Evaluation of Poisson solvation models using a hybrid explicit/implicit solvent method.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; Mark A Olson
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Acceptable protein and solvent behavior in primary hydration shell simulations of hen lysozyme.

Authors:  Mehdi Bagheri Hamaneh; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Binding of Rac1, Rnd1, and RhoD to a novel Rho GTPase interaction motif destabilizes dimerization of the plexin-B1 effector domain.

Authors:  Yufeng Tong; Preeti Chugha; Prasanta K Hota; Rebecca S Alviani; Mei Li; Wolfram Tempel; Limin Shen; Hee-Won Park; Matthias Buck
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Refined solution structure of the 82-kDa enzyme malate synthase G from joint NMR and synchrotron SAXS restraints.

Authors:  Alexander Grishaev; Vitali Tugarinov; Lewis E Kay; Jill Trewhella; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Hydrated myoglobin's anharmonic fluctuations are not primarily due to dihedral transitions.

Authors:  P J Steinbach; B R Brooks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function.

Authors:  Wonpil Im; Michael S Lee; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  1 in total

1.  Constant pH Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Nucleic Acids in Explicit Solvent.

Authors:  Garrett B Goh; Jennifer L Knight; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 6.006

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.