| Literature DB >> 19381866 |
Jan Bucerius1, Alexius Y Joe, Ellen Herder, Holger Brockmann, Kim Biermann, Holger Palmedo, Klaus Tiemann, Hans-Jürgen Biersack.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic value of hemodynamic variables during ergometric stress testing for (99m)Tc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) as compared to several patient-related variables and MPS results with regard to referral to early coronary angiography (<3 months after MPS; CA) as well as cardiac event (CE) free survival in a study population aged > or =70 years. About 90 patients aged > or =70 years (74.5 +/- 3.6 years) who underwent ergometric stress/rest MPS were included in this study. About 19 hemodynamic variables during stress testing were assessed. Semiquantitative visual interpretation of MPS images were performed and Summed-Stress-(SSS), Summed-Difference-, and Summed-Rest-Scores were calculated. Emerging CE comprised myocardial revascularization and -infarction as well as cardiac-related death. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for evaluation of independent prognostic impact of hemodynamic-, MPS- and clinical-variables with regard to referral to early catheterization as well as emerging CE. Kaplan-Meier survival- and log rank analyses were calculated for assessment of CE free survival. History of CAD (Odds ratio; OR: 99.3), low rest heart rate (OR: 14.9) and low peak systolic blood pressure (OR: 15.4) during ergometric stress testing as well as pathological SSS (OR: 48.4) were significantly associated with referral to CA. History of ischemic ECG (OR: 4.7) and pathological SSS (OR: 3.7) independently predicted emerging CE and were associated with a lower CE free survival. In patients aged > or =70 years, CA is independently predicted by clinical variables, pathological results of MPS and hemodynamic variables. In contrast, hemodynamic response to stress testing failed to show any predictive impact on emerging CE.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19381866 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-009-9461-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357