Literature DB >> 19380642

Development of an online morbidity, mortality, and near-miss reporting system to identify patterns of adverse events in surgical patients.

Karl Y Bilimoria1, Thomas E Kmiecik, Debra A DaRosa, Amy Halverson, Mark K Eskandari, Richard H Bell, Nathaniel J Soper, Jeffrey D Wayne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To design a Web-based system to track adverse and near-miss events, to establish an automated method to identify patterns of events, and to assess the adverse event reporting behavior of physicians.
DESIGN: A Web-based system was designed to collect physician-reported adverse events including weekly Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) entries and anonymous adverse/near-miss events. An automated system was set up to help identify event patterns. Adverse event frequency was compared with hospital databases to assess reporting completeness.
SETTING: A metropolitan tertiary care center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of adverse event patterns and completeness of reporting.
RESULTS: From September 2005 to August 2007, 15,524 surgical patients were reported including 957 (6.2%) adverse events and 34 (0.2%) anonymous reports. The automated pattern recognition system helped identify 4 event patterns from M&M reports and 3 patterns from anonymous/near-miss reporting. After multidisciplinary meetings and expert reviews, the patterns were addressed with educational initiatives, correction of systems issues, and/or intensive quality monitoring. Only 25% of complications and 42% of inpatient deaths were reported. A total of 75.2% of adverse events resulting in permanent disability or death were attributed to the nature of the disease. Interventions to improve reporting were largely unsuccessful.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a user-friendly Web-based system to track complications and identify patterns of adverse events. Underreporting of adverse events and attributing the complication to the nature of the disease represent a problem in reporting culture among surgeons at our institution. Similar systems should be used by surgery departments, particularly those affiliated with teaching hospitals, to identify quality improvement opportunities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19380642     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  15 in total

1.  Development, implementation, and evaluation of a hybrid electronic medical record system specifically designed for a developing world surgical service.

Authors:  G L Laing; J L Bruce; D L Skinner; N L Allorto; D L Clarke; C Aldous
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  From box ticking to the black box: the evolution of operating room safety.

Authors:  Mitchell G Goldenberg; Dean Elterman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Adverse Events in the Operating Room: Definitions, Prevalence, and Characteristics. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  James J Jung; Jonah Elfassy; Peter Jüni; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Incident Reporting in Perfusion: Current Perceptions on PIRS-2.

Authors:  Timothy W Willcox; Robert A Baker
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2020-03

Review 5.  Interventions to increase clinical incident reporting in health care.

Authors:  Elena Parmelli; Gerd Flodgren; Scott G Fraser; Nicola Williams; Gregory Rubin; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

6.  Near-miss events are really missed! Reflections on incident reporting in a department of pediatric surgery.

Authors:  Girolamo Mattioli; Edoardo Guida; Giovanni Montobbio; Alessio Pini Prato; Marcello Carlucci; Armando Cama; Silvio Boero; Maria Beatrice Michelis; Elio Castagnola; Ubaldo Rosati; Vincenzo Jasonni
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Using a hybrid electronic medical record system for the surveillance of adverse surgical events and human error in a developing world surgical service.

Authors:  Grant Laing; John Bruce; David Skinner; Nikki Allorto; Colleen Aldous; Sandie Thomson; Damian Clarke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Can Surgeons Adequately Capture Adverse Events Using the Spinal Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) and OrthoSAVES?

Authors:  Brian P Chen; Katie Garland; Darren M Roffey; Stephane Poitras; Geoffrey Dervin; Peter Lapner; Philippe Phan; Eugene K Wai; Stephen P Kingwell; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Systematic review of hospital-wide complication registries.

Authors:  I Saarinen; A Malmivaara; R Miikki; A Kaipia
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-07-27

10.  Aviation and healthcare: a comparative review with implications for patient safety.

Authors:  Narinder Kapur; Anam Parand; Tayana Soukup; Tom Reader; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2015-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.