Literature DB >> 19380410

Response to therapy in breast cancer.

Norbert Avril1, Stefanie Sassen, Rebecca Roylance.   

Abstract

Increasing numbers of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer receive primary systemic therapy followed by surgery. Histopathology provides an accurate assessment of treatment efficacy on the basis of the extent of residual tumor and regressive changes within tumor tissue. However, only approximately 20% of breast cancer patients achieve a pathologic complete response, a fact that necessitates methods for monitoring therapeutic effectiveness early during therapy. (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FDG PET/CT provide essential information regarding a response to primary chemotherapy. Patients with low tumor metabolic activity on pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET are not likely to achieve a histopathologic response. The degree of changes in (18)F-FDG uptake after the initiation of therapy is correlated with the histopathologic response after the completion of therapy. Thus, tumor metabolic changes assessed early during therapy predict therapeutic effectiveness in individual patients. Early identification of ineffective therapy also might be helpful in patients with metastatic breast cancer because many palliative treatment options are available. Changes in metabolic activity generally occur earlier than changes in tumor size, which is the current standard for the assessment of a response. Although treatment stratification based on a metabolic response is an exciting potential application of PET, specific PET response assessment criteria still need to be developed and validated on the basis of patient outcomes before changes in treatment regimens can be implemented. There is increasing clinical evidence for metastatic breast cancer and other tumors that (18)F-FDG PET/CT is the most accurate imaging procedure for assessment of the response at the end of treatment when both CT information and tumor metabolic activity are considered. Importantly, in the setting of primary chemotherapy, neither PET/CT nor conventional imaging procedures can assess the extent of residual breast cancer as accurately as histopathology. Observation of changes in tumor blood flow or tumor cell proliferation is an additional encouraging approach for predicting a response. Ultimately, the prediction of therapeutic effectiveness by PET and PET/CT could help to individualize treatment and to avoid ineffective chemotherapies, with their associated toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19380410     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  26 in total

1.  Is a SUV cut-off necessary in the evaluation of the response of axillary lymph node metastases to neoadjuvant therapy?

Authors:  Laura Gilardi; Giovanni Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Christian Rubbert; Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Chiara Gaeta; Roger Yuh; Lisa Zipp; Karin A Herrmann; Mark R Robbin; Zhenghong Lee; Raymond F Muzic; Peter Faulhaber; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-20

4.  Multiparametric and Multimodality Functional Radiological Imaging for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Early Treatment Response Assessment.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Antonio C Wolff; Katarzyna J Macura; Vered Stearns; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Riham El Khouli; David A Bluemke; Richard Wahl
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2015-05

Review 5.  Role of positron emission tomography for the monitoring of response to therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Alexandre Cochet; Bruno Coudert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Salim Kanoun; François Brunotte; Pierre Fumoleau
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-01-05

6.  Immunotherapeutic potential of anti-human endogenous retrovirus-K envelope protein antibodies in targeting breast tumors.

Authors:  Feng Wang-Johanning; Kiera Rycaj; Joshua B Plummer; Ming Li; Bingnan Yin; Katherine Frerich; Jeremy G Garza; Jianjun Shen; Kevin Lin; Peisha Yan; Sharon A Glynn; Tiffany H Dorsey; Kelly K Hunt; Stefan Ambs; Gary L Johanning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Determining efficacy of breast cancer therapy by PET imaging of HER2 mRNA.

Authors:  Bishnuhari Paudyal; Kaijun Zhang; Chang-Po Chen; Matthew E Wampole; Neil Mehta; Edith P Mitchell; Brian D Gray; Jeffrey A Mattis; Koon Y Pak; Mathew L Thakur; Eric Wickstrom
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Reporter nanoparticle that monitors its anticancer efficacy in real time.

Authors:  Ashish Kulkarni; Poornima Rao; Siva Natarajan; Aaron Goldman; Venkata S Sabbisetti; Yashika Khater; Navya Korimerla; Vineethkrishna Chandrasekar; Raghunath A Mashelkar; Shiladitya Sengupta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist. A review article on the modified RECIST guideline.

Authors:  Els L van Persijn van Meerten; Hans Gelderblom; Johan L Bloem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Assessment of residual tumour by FDG-PET: conventional imaging and clinical examination following primary chemotherapy of large and locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J Dose-Schwarz; R Tiling; S Avril-Sassen; S Mahner; A Lebeau; C Weber; M Schwaiger; F Jänicke; M Untch; N Avril
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.