Literature DB >> 19379861

What is the value of a p value?

Gary L Grunkemeier1, YingXing Wu, Anthony P Furnary.   

Abstract

Successful publication of a research study usually requires a small p value, typically p < 0.05. Many clinicians believe that a p value represents the probability that the null hypothesis is true, so that a small p value means the null hypothesis must be false. In fact, the p value provides very weak evidence against the null hypothesis, and the probability that the null hypothesis is true is usually much greater than the p value would suggest. Moreover, even considering "the probability that the null hypothesis is true" is not possible with the usual statistical setup and requires a different (Bayesian) statistical approach. We describe the Bayesian approach using a well-established diagnostic testing analogy. Then, as a practical example, we compare the p-value result of a study of aprotinin-associated operative mortality with the more illuminative interpretation of the same study data using a Bayesian approach.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19379861     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Insights, Pearls, and Guidance on Successfully Producing and Publishing Educational Research.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Frank Romanelli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Irrelevance of CHEK2 variants to diagnosis of breast/ovarian cancer predisposition in Polish cohort.

Authors:  Aleksander Myszka; Pawel Karpinski; Ryszard Slezak; Halina Czemarmazowicz; Agnieszka Stembalska; Justyna Gil; Izabela Laczmanska; Damian Bednarczyk; Elzbieta Szmida; Maria Malgorzata Sasiadek
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Misleading p-value:do you recognise it?

Authors:  Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Kittipong Dhanuthai; Alexander Hemprich; Niels Christian Pausch
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-07

4.  Trends in pediatric appendectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Aaron M Abarbanell
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Short term and long term results after open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy in childhood and adolescence: a subgroup analysis.

Authors:  Matthias Kapischke; Alexandra Pries; Amke Caliebe
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  The Probability of Inconstancy in Assessment of Cardiac Function Post-Myocardial Infarction in Mice.

Authors:  Jiqiu Chen; Nadjib Hammoudi; Ludovic Benard; Delaine K Ceholski; Shihong Zhang; Djamel Lebeche; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Pharm Open Access       Date:  2016-09-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.