BACKGROUND:Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has become the treatment of choice for patients with medically resistant chronic rhinosinusitis. Nasal packing is usually placed after the surgery to support wound healing and prevent adhesions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of carboxy-methylated cellulose (CMC) nasal packing on wound healing after FESS compared with no nasal packing. METHODS: Twenty-six patients underwent bilateral FESS. The patients were randomized to receive CMC mesh or gel packing on one side and no packing on the opposite side. The patients were followed at 2, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. Endoscopically visible CMC, crusting, mucosal integrity, synechia formation, granulation tissue formation, and adverse side effects were assessed and documented. RESULTS: No adverse side effects were observed. No significant differences were found between the CMC-packed side and the unpacked side with respect to the outcome measure of wound healing. No difference was found between two different forms of CMC in terms of wound healing. Two weeks after surgery, endoscopically visible CMC was detected in four patients of the CMC mesh group, whereas none of the patients in the CMC gel group had endoscopically visible CMC (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: As we were unable to establish an effect, we must question the efficacy of this packing material and the necessity of its use after FESS based on the technique of the Graz University Medical School. The mesh form of CMC could be potentially useful as a vehicle for extended drug delivery owing to its longer retention time in the nose.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has become the treatment of choice for patients with medically resistant chronic rhinosinusitis. Nasal packing is usually placed after the surgery to support wound healing and prevent adhesions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of carboxy-methylated cellulose (CMC) nasal packing on wound healing after FESS compared with no nasal packing. METHODS: Twenty-six patients underwent bilateral FESS. The patients were randomized to receive CMC mesh or gel packing on one side and no packing on the opposite side. The patients were followed at 2, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. Endoscopically visible CMC, crusting, mucosal integrity, synechia formation, granulation tissue formation, and adverse side effects were assessed and documented. RESULTS: No adverse side effects were observed. No significant differences were found between the CMC-packed side and the unpacked side with respect to the outcome measure of wound healing. No difference was found between two different forms of CMC in terms of wound healing. Two weeks after surgery, endoscopically visible CMC was detected in four patients of the CMC mesh group, whereas none of the patients in the CMC gel group had endoscopically visible CMC (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION: As we were unable to establish an effect, we must question the efficacy of this packing material and the necessity of its use after FESS based on the technique of the Graz University Medical School. The mesh form of CMC could be potentially useful as a vehicle for extended drug delivery owing to its longer retention time in the nose.
Authors: Kathleyn A Brandstetter; Joseph A Jurcisek; Steven D Goodman; Lauren O Bakaletz; Subinoy Das Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 3.325