Literature DB >> 19377899

Elements of metacommunity structure of Paraguayan bats: multiple gradients require analysis of multiple ordination axes.

Steven J Presley1, Christopher L Higgins, Celia López-González, Richard D Stevens.   

Abstract

Techniques to evaluate elements of metacommunity structure (EMS; coherence, species turnover and range boundary clumping) have been available for several years. Such approaches are capable of determining which idealized pattern of species distribution best describes distributions in a metacommunity. Nonetheless, this approach rarely is employed and such aspects of metacommunity structure remain poorly understood. We expanded an extant method to better investigate metacommunity structure for systems that respond to multiple environmental gradients. We used data obtained from 26 sites throughout Paraguay as a model system to demonstrate application of this methodology. Using presence-absence data for bats, we evaluated coherence, species turnover and boundary clumping to distinguish among six idealized patterns of species distribution. Analyses were conducted for all bats as well as for each of three feeding ensembles (aerial insectivores, frugivores and molossid insectivores). For each group of bats, analyses were conducted separately for primary and secondary axes of ordination as defined by reciprocal averaging. The Paraguayan bat metacommunity evinced Clementsian distributions for primary and secondary ordination axes. Patterns of species distribution for aerial insectivores were dependent on ordination axis, showing Gleasonian distributions when ordinated according to the primary axis and Clementsian distributions when ordinated according to the secondary axis. Distribution patterns for frugivores and molossid insectivores were best described as random. Analysis of metacommunities using multiple ordination axes can provide a more complete picture of environmental variables that mold patterns of species distribution. Moreover, analysis of EMS along defined gradients (e.g., latitude, elevation and depth) or based on alternative ordination techniques may complement insights based on reciprocal averaging because the fundamental questions addressed in analyses are contingent on the ordination technique that is employed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19377899     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1341-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  Geographical ecology of Paraguayan bats: spatial integration and metacommunity structure of interacting assemblages.

Authors:  Richard D Stevens; Celia López-González; Steven J Presley
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  On the meaning and measurement of nestedness of species assemblages.

Authors:  David H Wright; Jaxk H Reeves
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A null model for randomization tests of nestedness in species assemblages.

Authors:  Bengt Gunnar Jonsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition.

Authors:  David H Wright; Bruce D Patterson; Greg M Mikkelson; Alan Cutler; Wirt Atmar
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total
  12 in total

1.  Environmental filtering determines metacommunity structure in wetland microcrustaceans.

Authors:  Stéphanie Gascón; Ignasi Arranz; Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles; Alfonso Nebra; Albert Ruhí; Maria Rieradevall; Nuno Caiola; Jordi Sala; Carles Ibàñez; Xavier D Quintana; Dani Boix
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Faunal breaks and species composition of Indo-Pacific corals: the role of plate tectonics, environment and habitat distribution.

Authors:  S A Keith; A H Baird; T P Hughes; J S Madin; S R Connolly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A canonical metacommunity structure over 3 decades: ecologically consistent but spatially dynamic patterns in a hurricane-prone montane forest.

Authors:  Michael R Willig; Steven J Presley; Eve I Cullerton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Temporal variation of metacommunity structure in arthropod ectoparasites harboured by small mammals: the effects of scale and climatic fluctuations.

Authors:  Boris R Krasnov; Natalia Korallo-Vinarskaya; Maxim V Vinarski; Irina S Khokhlova
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Disentangling the drivers of metacommunity structure across spatial scales.

Authors:  Christine N Meynard; Sébastien Lavergne; Isabelle Boulangeat; Luc Garraud; Jérémie Van Es; Nicolas Mouquet; Wilfried Thuiller
Journal:  J Biogeogr       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.324

6.  Environmental Controls on River Assemblages at the Regional Scale: An Application of the Elements of Metacommunity Structure Framework.

Authors:  Jonathan D Tonkin; Andrea Sundermann; Sonja C Jähnig; Peter Haase
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A comparative analysis of metacommunity types in the freshwater realm.

Authors:  Jani Heino; Janne Soininen; Janne Alahuhta; Jyrki Lappalainen; Risto Virtanen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Do latitudinal gradients exist in New Zealand stream invertebrate metacommunities?

Authors:  Jonathan D Tonkin; Russell G Death; Timo Muotka; Anna Astorga; David A Lytle
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Varying Patterns on Varying Scales: A Metacommunity Analysis of Nematodes in European Lakes.

Authors:  Birgit Dümmer; Kai Ristau; Walter Traunspurger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A synthesis of ecological and evolutionary determinants of bat diversity across spatial scales.

Authors:  Franciele Parreira Peixoto; Pedro Henrique Pereira Braga; Poliana Mendes
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.