Literature DB >> 19377326

Commentary: indicators with a purpose - meaningful performance measurement and the importance of strategy.

Adalsteinn D Brown1, Jeremy Veillard.   

Abstract

Sarah Bowen and Sara Kreindler argue that indicators can be valuable, but are also often flawed. They suggest that performance indicators should at best serve as a flag for policy makers but should not drive decisions. We would argue that there is growing evidence of the positive impact of performance indicators. When performance indicators are selected based on sound strategies - and used as part of a clear performance management cycle that balances policy instruments (e.g., accountability agreements) and performance improvement processes (e.g., process redesign) - they can drive valuable performance improvements and help align strategies across all health system partners.
Copyright © 2008 Longwoods Publishing.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19377326      PMCID: PMC2645161     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample.

Authors:  Steven M Asch; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Mary M Hogan; Rodney A Hayward; Paul Shekelle; Lisa Rubenstein; Joan Keesey; John Adams; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Have targets improved performance in the English NHS?

Authors:  Gwyn Bevan; Christopher Hood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-18
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Selecting contextually appropriate performance indicators in a circumpolar context: a modified Delphi approach.

Authors:  Rebecca Rich; Thomsen D'Hont; Kellie E Murphy; Jeremy Veillard; Susan Chatwood
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.