Literature DB >> 19377182

Exporting simulation technology to the Philippines: a comparative study of traditional versus simulation methods for teaching intravenous cannulation.

Juan Alejandro R Sotto1, Eduardo C Ayuste, Mark W Bowyer, Josefina R Almonte, Rodney B Dofitas, Marie C M Lapitan, Elisabeth A Pimentel, E Matthew Ritter, David C Wherry.   

Abstract

This study examines effectiveness of a donated Laerdal Virtual I.V. simulator when compared with traditional methods of teaching intravenous (IV) cannulation to third year medical students in the Philippines. Forty novice Filipino medical students viewed an instructional video on how to start intravenous lines and were then randomly divided into two groups of twenty. The "Traditional" group observed an IV insertion on an actual patient performed by an experienced practitioner, and then subsequently performed an IV on an actual patient which was videotaped. The "Simulation" group practiced the Virtual I.V. simulator until they successfully completed level three using the "doctor" setting. These students then performed an IV on an actual patient which was videotaped. The videotapes for both groups were reviewed by two pre-trained (Inter-rater reliability of > or =0.84) observers who were blinded to the group using a previously validated checklist for IV insertion. Students trained on the Virtual I.V. showed significantly greater success in successfully starting an IV on an actual patient (40% VS. 15%, p<0.05), decreased constrictive band time (p<.05), increased raw score on the check list (p<.03), and decreased overall time to start an IV (p<.05). The technology was well received but wider application in the non western world is limited by lack of in country company support and the relative expense.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19377182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  5 in total

1.  Implementation and Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Simulation: Intravenous Injection Training System.

Authors:  Ji Sun Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Ryan Brydges; Amy T Wang; David A Cook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Outcomes, Measurement Instruments, and Their Validity Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality in Undergraduate Medical Education: Systematic Mapping Review.

Authors:  Lorainne Tudor Car; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Andrew Teo; Tatiana Erlikh Fox; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Christian Apfelbacher; Sandra Kemp; Niels Chavannes
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 3.364

Review 4.  How valid are commercially available medical simulators?

Authors:  Jj Stunt; Ph Wulms; Gm Kerkhoffs; J Dankelman; Cn van Dijk; Gjm Tuijthof
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-10-14

Review 5.  Comparing Intravenous Insertion Instructional Methods with Haptic Simulators.

Authors:  Lenora A McWilliams; Ann Malecha
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.