BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injury location in primary patellar dislocation has not been studied. HYPOTHESIS: Prognosis after primary traumatic patellar dislocation may vary by MPFL injury location. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in 53 patients with identical nonoperative management were retrospectively analyzed for medial restraint injuries. The MPFL injury sites were classified as follows: femoral, midsubstance, and patellar. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess initial and control articular cartilage lesions in the patellofemoral joint. After a mean follow-up of 7 years, 42 patients were evaluated for redislocations, subjective symptoms, and functional limitations. RESULTS: Based on the initial MRIs, MPFL rupture was classified as femoral in 35 patients, midsubstance in 11, and patellar in 7. At follow-up, 15 patients reported an unstable patella (13 femoral, 1 patellar, 1 midsubstance; P = .01) and 9 reported patellar redislocations (8 femoral, 1 midsubstance; P = .05). The proportion of patients who regained their preinjury activity level was significantly smaller among those with femoral MPFL injury than among those with midsubstance or patellar MPFL injury (P = .05). The median Kujala score was as follows: 90 for femoral, 91 for patellar, and 96 for midsubstance (P = .76). Control MRI showed full-thickness patellofemoral cartilage lesions in 50% of the patients, unrelated to MPFL injury location. CONCLUSION: An MPFL avulsion at the femoral attachment in primary traumatic patellar dislocations predicts subsequent patellar instability. The authors suggest that MPFL injury location be taken into account when planning treatment of primary traumatic patellar dislocation.
BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injury location in primary patellar dislocation has not been studied. HYPOTHESIS: Prognosis after primary traumatic patellar dislocation may vary by MPFL injury location. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in 53 patients with identical nonoperative management were retrospectively analyzed for medial restraint injuries. The MPFL injury sites were classified as follows: femoral, midsubstance, and patellar. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess initial and control articular cartilage lesions in the patellofemoral joint. After a mean follow-up of 7 years, 42 patients were evaluated for redislocations, subjective symptoms, and functional limitations. RESULTS: Based on the initial MRIs, MPFL rupture was classified as femoral in 35 patients, midsubstance in 11, and patellar in 7. At follow-up, 15 patients reported an unstable patella (13 femoral, 1 patellar, 1 midsubstance; P = .01) and 9 reported patellar redislocations (8 femoral, 1 midsubstance; P = .05). The proportion of patients who regained their preinjury activity level was significantly smaller among those with femoral MPFL injury than among those with midsubstance or patellar MPFL injury (P = .05). The median Kujala score was as follows: 90 for femoral, 91 for patellar, and 96 for midsubstance (P = .76). Control MRI showed full-thickness patellofemoral cartilage lesions in 50% of the patients, unrelated to MPFL injury location. CONCLUSION: An MPFL avulsion at the femoral attachment in primary traumatic patellar dislocations predicts subsequent patellar instability. The authors suggest that MPFL injury location be taken into account when planning treatment of primary traumatic patellar dislocation.
Authors: Shrey K Thawait; Theodoros Soldatos; Gaurav K Thawait; Andrew J Cosgarea; John A Carrino; Avneesh Chhabra Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Lars V von Engelhardt; Marthina Raddatz; Bertil Bouillon; Gunter Spahn; Andreas Dàvid; Patrick Haage; Thomas K Lichtinger Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 2.362