Literature DB >> 19376922

Increased antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli in mature biofilms.

Akinobu Ito1, Asami Taniuchi, Thithiwat May, Koji Kawata, Satoshi Okabe.   

Abstract

Biofilms are considered to be highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this high resistance of biofilms, including restricted penetration of antimicrobial agents into biofilms, slow growth owing to nutrient limitation, expression of genes involved in the general stress response, and emergence of a biofilm-specific phenotype. However, since combinations of these factors are involved in most biofilm studies, it is still difficult to fully understand the mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antibiotics. In this study, the antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli cells in biofilms was investigated with exclusion of the effects of the restricted penetration of antimicrobial agents into biofilms and the slow growth owing to nutrient limitation. Three different antibiotics, ampicillin (100 microg/ml), kanamycin (25 microg/ml), and ofloxacin (10 microg/ml), were applied directly to cells in the deeper layers of mature biofilms that developed in flow cells after removal of the surface layers of the biofilms. The results of the antibiotic treatment analyses revealed that ofloxacin and kanamycin were effective against biofilm cells, whereas ampicillin did not kill the cells, resulting in regrowth of the biofilm after the ampicillin treatment was discontinued. LIVE/DEAD staining revealed that a small fraction of resistant cells emerged in the deeper layers of the mature biofilms and that these cells were still alive even after 24 h of ampicillin treatment. Furthermore, to determine which genes in the biofilm cells are induced, allowing increased resistance to ampicillin, global gene expression was analyzed at different stages of biofilm formation, the attachment, colony formation, and maturation stages. The results showed that significant changes in gene expression occurred during biofilm formation, which were partly induced by rpoS expression. Based on the experimental data, it is likely that the observed resistance of biofilms can be attributed to formation of ampicillin-resistant subpopulations in the deeper layers of mature biofilms but not in young colony biofilms and that the production and resistance of the subpopulations were aided by biofilm-specific phenotypes, like slow growth and induction of rpoS-mediated stress responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376922      PMCID: PMC2698376          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02949-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  53 in total

1.  Quorum sensing: the explanation of a curious phenomenon reveals a common characteristic of bacteria.

Authors:  J W Hastings; E P Greenberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms.

Authors:  P S Stewart; J W Costerton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations.

Authors:  J M Andrews
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT.

Authors:  A Heydorn; A T Nielsen; M Hentzer; C Sternberg; M Givskov; B K Ersbøll; S Molin
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.777

5.  Forging a link between biofilms and disease.

Authors:  C Potera
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  T F Mah; G A O'Toole
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.079

7.  One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products.

Authors:  K A Datsenko; B L Wanner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A dose-response study of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  A Brooun; S Liu; K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Analyses of spatial distributions of sulfate-reducing bacteria and their activity in aerobic wastewater biofilms.

Authors:  S Okabe; T Itoh; H Satoh; Y Watanabe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Programmed death in bacteria.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.056

View more
  88 in total

1.  Rho-dependent termination of ssrS (6S RNA) transcription in Escherichia coli: implication for 3' processing of 6S RNA and expression of downstream ygfA (putative 5-formyl-tetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase).

Authors:  Huiseok Chae; Kook Han; Kwang-sun Kim; Hongmarn Park; Jungmin Lee; Younghoon Lee
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Multiple resistance mechanisms acting in unison in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate.

Authors:  Dhriti Mallik; Akash Kumar; Sujoy Kumar Sarkar; Anindya S Ghosh
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Generalized relationship between numbers of bacteria and their viability in biofilms.

Authors:  Jelmer Sjollema; Minie Rustema-Abbing; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Antimicrobial resistance in more than 100,000 Escherichia coli isolates according to culture site and patient age, gender, and location.

Authors:  José Miguel Sahuquillo-Arce; María Selva; Hèctor Perpiñán; Miguel Gobernado; Carmen Armero; Antonio López-Quílez; Francisco González; Hermelinda Vanaclocha
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Biofilm-specific antibiotic tolerance and resistance.

Authors:  I Olsen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  TiO2-containing and ZnO-containing borosilicate glass-a novel thin glass with exceptional antibiofilm performances to prevent microfouling.

Authors:  Mareike Klinger-Strobel; Oliwia Makarewicz; Mathias W Pletz; Andreas Stallmach; Christian Lautenschläger
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Identification and Characterization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptide from Hippocampus comes by In Silico and Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Mohsen Mohammadi; Behrouz Taheri; Niloofar Momenzadeh; Reza Salarinia; Iraj Nabipour; Zahra Farshadzadeh; Afshar Bargahi
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Non-invasive imaging of oxygen concentration in a complex in vitro biofilm infection model using 19 F MRI: Persistence of an oxygen sink despite prolonged antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Simkins; Philip S Stewart; Sarah L Codd; Joseph D Seymour
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Silver oxynitrate, an unexplored silver compound with antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity.

Authors:  Joe A Lemire; Lindsay Kalan; Alexandru Bradu; Raymond J Turner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Ureolytic Biomineralization Reduces Proteus mirabilis Biofilm Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  Xiaobao Li; Nanxi Lu; Hannah R Brady; Aaron I Packman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.