Literature DB >> 19376633

Antimicrobial properties of dentine bonding agents determined using in vitro and ex vivo methods.

M Vaidyanathan1, E C Sheehy, S C Gilbert, D Beighton.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the antimicrobial properties of a selection of dentine bonding agents [DBAs] using the disc diffusion and direct contact methods and an ex vivo method using extracted carious permanent molar teeth.
METHODS: DBAs (n=15) were tested using Streptococcus mutans UA159 in disc diffusion and direct contact methods. In the ex vivo study 6 DBAs were selected and pre- and post-treatment samples of carious dentine (n< or =12) were taken. Samples were also taken post-acid-etching. The number of microorganisms in dentine sample was determined and compared.
RESULTS: The inhibition zones and percent growth inhibition were related to the pH of the culture medium containing the DBA (p<0.01). Clearfill Protect Bond exhibited the greatest bacterial killing followed by ibond (99.8%+/-0.08 and 98.2+/-1.4, respectively). The phosphoric acid etchant alone resulted in an 83% killing. The in vitro tests results did not correlate. The ex vivo killing reflected the percent growth inhibition observed in the direct contact method.
CONCLUSION: A guide to the potential antimicrobial activity of a DBA may be gained from an assessment of its pH when added to bacteriological culture medium. The direct contact method gives a better reflection of the killing of bacteria in infected dentine than the disk diffusion method. Killing in the ex vivo model gives a more realistic and more reliable method for determining the antibacterial activity of a given DBA and that comparisons of the relative inhibitory activity of DBAs should be tested using this ex vivo model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376633     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  6 in total

Review 1.  Can interaction of materials with the dentin-pulp complex contribute to dentin regeneration?

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane; Paul R Cooper; Anthony J Smith
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 2.  State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives.

Authors:  David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay; Lorenzo Breschi; Leo Tjäderhane; Ricardo M Carvalho; Marcela Carrilho; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Nanotechnology-based restorative materials for dental caries management.

Authors:  Mary A S Melo; Sarah F F Guedes; Hockin H K Xu; Lidiany K A Rodrigues
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Antibacterial Activity of Commercial Dentine Bonding Systems against E. faecalis-Flow Cytometry Study.

Authors:  Monika Lukomska-Szymanska; Magdalena Konieczka; Beata Zarzycka; Barbara Lapinska; Janina Grzegorczyk; Jerzy Sokolowski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Flow Cytometry Analysis of Antibacterial Effects of Universal Dentin Bonding Agents on Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Barbara Lapinska; Magdalena Konieczka; Beata Zarzycka; Krzysztof Sokolowski; Janina Grzegorczyk; Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Comparative evaluation of the antibacterial effects of four dentine bonding systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ruchi Arora; Murali H Rao
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.