Literature DB >> 19376585

Randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab alone or combined with triamcinolone versus macular photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema.

Masoud Soheilian1, Alireza Ramezani, Arash Obudi, Bijan Bijanzadeh, Masoud Salehipour, Mehdi Yaseri, Hamid Ahmadieh, Mohammad H Dehghan, Mohsen Azarmina, Siamak Moradian, Gholam A Peyman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the results of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection alone or in combination with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) versus macular laser photocoagulation (MPC) as a primary treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).
DESIGN: Randomized 3-arm clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 150 eyes of 129 patients with clinically significant DME and no previous treatment.
METHODS: The eyes were randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 study arms: the IVB group, patients who received 1.25 mg IVB (50 eyes); the IVB/IVT group, patients who received 1.25 mg of IVB and 2 mg of IVT (50 eyes); and the MPC group, patients who underwent focal or modified grid laser (50 eyes). Retreatment was performed at 12-week intervals whenever indicated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in best-corrected visual acuity (VA) at week 24.
RESULTS: VA changes among the groups were statistically significant at 6 (P<0.001) and 24 (P = 0.012) weeks. The significant treatment effect was demonstrated in the IVB group at all follow-up visits and in the IVB/IVT group at 6 and 12 weeks. VA changes +/- standard deviation at 36 weeks were -0.28+/-0.25, -0.04+/-0.33, and +0.01+/-0.27 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution in the IVB, IVB/IVT, and MPC groups, respectively (P = 0.053). Significant central macular thickness (CMT) reduction was observed in all groups only up to 6 weeks; however, CMT changes were not significant among the groups in all visits. Overall, retreatment was required for 27 eyes up to 36 weeks (14 in the IVB group, 10 in the IVB/IVT group, and 3 in the MPC group). In the IVB group, in which a greater VA improvement was observed, only 1 injection was required in 72% of the cases. VA improvement >2 Snellen lines at 36 weeks was detected in 37%, 25%, and 14.8% of patients in the IVB, IVB/IVT, and MPC groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab injection in patients with DME yielded a better visual outcome at 24 weeks compared with macular photocoagulation. A change in CMT beyond the 6-week time point that corresponded to the vision change was not detected. No adjunctive effect of IVT was demonstrated. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376585     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  76 in total

1.  Cysteine-rich 61 (CYR61) is up-regulated in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Weihong Yu; Fangtian Dong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Diabetic maculopathy and retinopathy. Functional and sociomedical significance].

Authors:  J G Garweg; A Wenzel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Use of bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Taygan Yilmaz; Miguel Cordero-Coma
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  [Navigated focal retinal laser therapy using the NAVILAS® system for diabetic macula edema].

Authors:  M Kernt; R Cheuteu; R G Liegl; F Seidensticker; S Cserhati; C Hirneiss; C Haritoglou; A Kampik; M Ulbig; A S Neubauer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab alone or with triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of macular edema caused by central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Wang; Xiao Li; Yus-Sheng Wang; Zi-Feng Zhang; Man-Hong Li; Xiao-Na Su; Jin-Ting Zhu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  [Navigated retinal laser therapy].

Authors:  M Kernt; M Ulbig; A Kampik; A S Neubauer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Intravitreal triamcinolone versus intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Ling Zhang; Jian Chen; Ri-Jia Zhang; Wen-Jie Wang; Qing Zhou; Xiao-Yan Qin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 8.  Lack of positive effect of intravitreal bevacizumab in central serous chorioretinopathy: meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  Y-R Chung; E J Seo; H M Lew; K H Lee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Optical Coherence Tomography Features in Diabetic Macular Edema and the Impact on Anti-VEGF Response.

Authors:  Yuji Itoh; Daniel Petkovsek; Peter K Kaiser; Rishi P Singh; Justis P Ehlers
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.300

10.  Current treatments in diabetic macular oedema: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Alexander Ford; Noemi Lois; Pamela Royle; Christine Clar; Deepson Shyangdan; Norman Waugh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.