Literature DB >> 19376568

Partial versus radical nephrectomy in patients with adverse clinical or pathologic characteristics.

Claudio Jeldres1, Jean-Jacques Patard, Umberto Capitanio, Paul Perrotte, Nazareno Suardi, Maxime Crepel, Vincenzo Ficarra, Luca Cindolo, Alexandre de La Taille, Jacques Tostain, Christian Pfister, Baptiste Albouy, Marc Colombel, Arnaud Méjean, Hervé Lang, Didier Jacqmin, Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Jean-Marie Ferrière, Karim Bensalah, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess cancer-specific survival of partial nephrectomy (PN) patients with >or= 7-cm lesions or unfavorable pathology (stage T3a or Fuhrman grades III-IV).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: At 13 participation centers, 4072 partial or radical nephrectomies (RN) were performed for RCC between 1984 and 2001. Of all procedures, 925 (22.7%) were for tumors > 7 cm, 973 (23.9%) had Fuhrman grades III or IV, and 861 (21.1%) had stage pT3a. None had nodal or distant metastases. Matched (age, gender, tumor size, T stage, histologic subtype, and Fuhrman grade [FG]) survival analyses addressed the effect of nephrectomy type (partial vs radical) on cancer-specific mortality.
RESULTS: Partial nephrectomy for tumors > 7 cm was associated with higher mortality than RN (HR = 5.3; P = .025). No significant cancer-specific survival differences were recorded after PN for FG III-IV (HR = 0.7, P = .5) or for pT3a lesions (HR = 2.5, P = .9).
CONCLUSIONS: Partial nephrectomy may undermine cancer control in patients with tumors > 7 cm. Conversely, after PN, the same cancer control rates as after RN may be expected in patients with Fuhrman grades III-IV or with pT3a histology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376568     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

Review 1.  Nephron-sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma: current perspectives on technical issues.

Authors:  Javier González; José Manuel Cózar; Antonio Gómez; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Manuel Esteban
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Survival after partial and radical nephrectomy for high-risk disease: A propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Hui Zhu; Simon Kim; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Stefanie Schmidt; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Arkadiusz Miernik; Philipp Dahm; Anne Cleves; Mario Walther; Nils Kroeger
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-09

4.  The use of nephrometry scoring systems can help urologists predict the risk of conversion to radical nephrectomy in patients scheduled for partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Marta Rossanese; Gianluca Giannarini; Alessandro Crestani; Alchiede Simonato; Antonino Inferrera
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 5.  Contemporary Experience with Partial Nephrectomy for Stage T2 or Greater Renal Tumors.

Authors:  Shaheen Alanee; Michelle Herberts; Bradley Holland; Danuta Dynda
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Percutaneous cryoablation for clinical T3a renal cell carcinoma (< 7 cm) with segmental vein involvement or perinephric fat invasion based on preoperative evaluation of high-resolution multidetector computed tomography scan.

Authors:  Mayu Uka; Toshihiro Iguchi; Nanako Okawa; Yusuke Matsui; Koji Tomita; Noriyuki Umakoshi; Kazuaki Munetomo; Hideo Gobara; Motoo Araki; Takao Hiraki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Oncological outcomes of minimally invasive partial versus minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for cT1-2/N0/M0 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Simone; Gabriele Tuderti; Umberto Anceschi; Rocco Papalia; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Leonardo Misuraca; Francesco Minisola; Riccardo Mastroianni; Manuela Costantini; Salvatore Guaglianone; Steno Sentinelli; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Oncological outcomes of patients with incidental pathological T3a stage small renal cell carcinoma after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Chunwoo Lee; Dalsan You; Sangjun Yoo; Cheryn Song; Bumsik Hong; Jun Hyuk Hong; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Oncological outcomes of partial nephrectomy for tumours larger than 4 cm: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tarek H El-Ghazaly; Ross J Mason; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T2 or Higher Stage Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ruizhen Huang; Chiyu Zhang; Xing Wang; Honglin Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.