Literature DB >> 19376493

Reduction of elective inductions in a large community hospital.

Dale P Reisner1, Terri K Wallin, Rosalee W Zingheim, David A Luthy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to lower unplanned primary cesarean deliveries by reducing elective inductions. STUDY
DESIGN: To implement and sustain an induction management program, a committee of care providers reviewed induction rates. "Elective" and other categories were defined. An induction consent form was drafted. Consent compliance, induction rates, hours in labor and delivery and mode of delivery were evaluated. Outcomes were compared with historical data from 2 years earlier.
RESULTS: A total of 10,166 nulliparas and 9869 multiparas attempted vaginal deliveries. Elective inductions decreased significantly, from 4.3% to 0.8% in nulliparas and from 13% to 9.5% in multiparas. A longer time to delivery was seen for both nulliparas (5.2 hours) and multiparas (4 hours) with elective inductions. Unplanned primary cesarean delivery rates are significantly lower in spontaneously laboring women, compared with those induced.
CONCLUSION: A program aimed at reducing elective inductions was successfully implemented and sustained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376493     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Trends in elective labor induction for six United States health plans, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Sascha Dublin; Karin E Johnson; Rod L Walker; Lyndsay A Avalos; Susan E Andrade; Sarah J Beaton; Robert L Davis; Lisa J Herrinton; Pamala A Pawloski; Marsha A Raebel; David H Smith; Sengwee Toh; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Patients' perspectives on the role of prepared childbirth education in decision making regarding elective labor induction.

Authors:  Kathleen Rice Simpson; Gloria Newman; Octavio R Chirino
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Factors that influence the practice of elective induction of labor: what does the evidence tell us?

Authors:  Jennifer Moore; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.638

4.  Clinical Impact of a Restrictive Labor Induction Approval Process.

Authors:  Mary Catherine Tolcher; Alexis N Hokenstad; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Carl H Rose; Abimbola O Famuyide; Brian C Brost
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.729

5.  Intrapartum cesarean delivery in nulliparas: risk factors compared by two analytical approaches.

Authors:  M A Kominiarek; P VanVeldhuisen; K Gregory; M Fridman; H Kim; J U Hibbard
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.521

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.