Literature DB >> 19376354

Impact of donor age on renal allograft function and survival.

L Resende1, J Guerra, A Santana, C Mil-Homens, F Abreu, A G da Costa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lack of cadaveric donors coupled with a rapidly growing number of potential recipients have stimulated the implementation of several strategies, including the acceptance of older donors, to increase the organ pool and reduce the waiting list for kidney transplantation. However several studies have demonstrated higher incidences of delayed graft function and poor graft outcomes among kidneys harvested from older donors.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of donor age on the function and long-term survival of renal allografts. PATIENTS: We performed a retrospective review of the clinical data from 441 adult kidney transplantation from cadaveric heart-beating donors performed in our unit from May 1989 to May 2007.
RESULTS: Recipients of kidney allografts from older donors were significantly older (49.2 vs 43.7 years; P < .0001) and had a higher incidence of delayed graft function (15.1% vs 5.4%; P = .005). Renal function was superior following kidney transplantation using younger donors not only at 3 months (P < .0001) and 12 months (P < .0001) posttransplantation, but also upon long-term follow-up at 60 months (P < .0001) and 96 months (P = .030). Allograft survival censored for death with a functioning graft and patient survival were not different when comparing older versus younger donors. Multivariate analysis confirmed the lack of correlation between donor age and allograft failure.
CONCLUSION: Donor age showed no influence on allograft survival. However, kidney allografts from older donors displayed lower first year and long-term renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376354     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.01.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

1.  Molecular diagnostics identifies risks for graft dysfunction despite borderline histologic changes.

Authors:  Petra Hrubá; Irena Brabcová; Faikah Gueler; Zdeněk Krejčík; Viktor Stránecký; Eva Svobodová; Jana Malušková; Wilfried Gwinner; Eva Honsová; Alena Lodererová; Rainer Oberbauer; Roman Zachoval; Ondřej Viklický
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Predicting the outcome of renal transplantation.

Authors:  Julia Lasserre; Steffen Arnold; Martin Vingron; Petra Reinke; Carl Hinrichs
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Does kidney transplantation with deceased or living donor affect graft survival?

Authors:  Eghlim Nemati; Behzad Einollahi; Mahboob Lesan Pezeshki; Vahid Porfarziani; Mohamad Reza Fattahi
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2014-07-05

4.  Kidney Discard Rates in the United States During American Transplant Congress Meetings.

Authors:  Dina Abdelwahab Elhamahmi; Thomas Chaly; Guo Wei; Isaac E Hall
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-12-04

5.  Clinical factors associated with severe hypophosphataemia after kidney transplant.

Authors:  Maximilian R Ralston; Karen S Stevenson; Patrick B Mark; Colin C Geddes
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.