Literature DB >> 19376308

Assessing proarrhythmic potential of drugs when optimal studies are infeasible.

Edwin P Rock1, John Finkle, Howard J Fingert, Brian P Booth, Christine E Garnett, Stephen Grant, Robert L Justice, Richard J Kovacs, Peter R Kowey, Ignacio Rodriguez, Wendy R Sanhai, Colette Strnadova, Shari L Targum, Yi Tsong, Kathleen Uhl, Norman Stockbridge.   

Abstract

Assessing the potential for a new drug to cause life-threatening arrhythmias is now an integral component of premarketing safety assessment. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Guideline (ICH) E14 recommends the "Thorough QT Study" (TQT) to assess clinical QT risk. Such a study calls for careful evaluation of drug effects on the electrocardiographic QT interval at multiples of therapeutic exposure and with a positive control to confirm assay sensitivity. Yet for some drugs and diseases, elements of the TQT Study may be impractical or unethical. In these instances, alternative approaches to QT risk assessment must be considered. This article presents points to consider for evaluation of QT risk when alternative approaches are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376308     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  24 in total

Review 1.  Prolonged QTc interval in cancer therapeutic drug development: defining arrhythmic risk in malignancy.

Authors:  Joanna M Brell
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 2.  Thorough QT Studies: Questions and Quandaries.

Authors:  Marek Malik; Christine E Garnett; Joanne Zhang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Update on the evaluation of a new drug for effects on cardiac repolarization in humans: issues in early drug development.

Authors:  Vaibhav Salvi; Dilip R Karnad; Gopi Krishna Panicker; Snehal Kothari
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  The thorough QT/QTc study 4 years after the implementation of the ICH E14 guidance.

Authors:  Borje Darpo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Early QT assessment--how can our confidence in the data be improved?

Authors:  Borje Darpo; Christine Garnett
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Dealing with global safety issues : was the response to QT-liability of non-cardiac drugs well coordinated?

Authors:  Norman Stockbridge; Joel Morganroth; Rashmi R Shah; Christine Garnett
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Towards a better understanding of QT interval variability.

Authors:  Larisa G Tereshchenko; Ronald D Berger
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2011-12

Review 8.  hERG1 potassium channel in cancer cells: a tool to reprogram immortality.

Authors:  Saverio Gentile
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.733

9.  A phase I, open-label, single-arm study for QT assessment of eribulin mesylate in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Thierry Lesimple; Julien Edeline; Timothy J Carrothers; Frédérique Cvitkovic; Borje Darpo; Jean-Pierre Delord; Hervé Léna; Nicolas Penel; Geoff J Edwards; Kenneth Law; Jantien Wanders; Allan Kristensen; Larisa Reyderman
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Modelling of drug-induced QT-interval prolongation: estimation approaches and translational opportunities.

Authors:  Eleonora Marostica; Karel Van Ammel; Ard Teisman; Koen Boussery; Jan Van Bocxlaer; Filip De Ridder; David Gallacher; An Vermeulen
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.