Literature DB >> 19375623

Risk of developing prostate cancer in the future: overview of prognostic biomarkers.

Neil E Fleshner1, Nathan Lawrentschuk.   

Abstract

In many disease states, the use of biomarkers is a standard method of determining both the presence and the risk of the future development of disease. For several years, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have been the standard measure for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and other prostatic diseases. However, recent data have indicated that PSA can also be used to determine the risk of developing PCa in the future. This evolving use of PSA is supported by clinical trial data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, and the Malmö Preventive Medicine Study. Data from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer have demonstrated that men with a PSA level of > or =1.5 ng/mL are at a significantly elevated risk of developing PCa compared with patients with a PSA level <1.5 ng/mL. The Malmö study showed that the PSA level could independently the predict cancer risk as far as 25-30 years into the future. Secondary nonserum risk factors (eg, age, family history, ethnicity) can also offer predictive value for determining the risk of developing future disease. Furthermore, recent investigations of novel biomarkers have yielded promising PCa prognostic candidates, including the PCa gene 3 and early PCa antigen 2. However, PSA remains the most reliable measure in assessing the risk of developing PCa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19375623     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  The pursuit of the "perfect" biomarker in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The 4q27 locus and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tindall; Hoa N Hoang; Melissa C Southey; Dallas R English; John L Hopper; Graham G Giles; Gianluca Severi; Vanessa M Hayes
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening: who and how?

Authors:  Allison S Glass; K Clint Cary; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Risk-based prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhu; Peter C Albertsen; Gerald L Andriole; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  A Hoxb13-driven reverse tetracycline transactivator system for conditional gene expression in the prostate.

Authors:  Varsha Rao; Jamie C Heard; Helya Ghaffari; Aminah Wali; Laura N Mutton; Charles J Bieberich
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 6.  Biomarkers in prostate cancer surveillance and screening: past, present, and future.

Authors:  K Clint Cary; Mathew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-12

7.  Assessment of information to substantiate a health claim on the prevention of prostate cancer by lignans.

Authors:  Niina M Saarinen; Juhani Tuominen; Liisa Pylkkänen; Risto Santti
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Downregulation of serum CXCL4L1 predicts progression and poor prognosis in prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mo Zhang; Johnny Guan; Yun-Long Huo; Yong-Sheng Song; Li-Zhu Chen
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Association of Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms with Prostate Cancer Risk from a Study in Central China.

Authors:  Shun Xu; Yongtao Hu; Ligang Zhang; Shaoyu Yue; Li Zhang; Chaozhao Liang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.009

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.