Literature DB >> 19375547

Using quality improvement techniques to increase colon cancer screening.

Michael P Pignone1, Carmen L Lewis.   

Abstract

Screening has been shown to be effective and cost-effective in reducing the incidence of, and mortality from, colorectal cancer. Despite its demonstrated efficacy, colon cancer screening remains underused, with fewer than 60% of age-eligible adults reporting being up to date with recommended screening tests. Several factors account for the low rates of utilization, including patient, provider and system-related issues. Several interventions have been shown to be effective in overcoming these barriers, including the use of patient decision aids. Patient decision aids are tools designed to provide information to patients about screening options, help them consider the pros and cons of the alternatives, and assist them to reach a decision consistent with their values. The use of decision aids in clinical practice can increase screening rates by up to 14 percentage points. Mailing the decision aids to patients in advance of office visits appears to be a cost-effective means of implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19375547      PMCID: PMC3983943          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Somnath Saha; Tom Hoerger; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis.

Authors:  Michael V Maciosek; Ashley B Coffield; Nichol M Edwards; Thomas J Flottemesch; Michael J Goodman; Leif I Solberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Videotape-based decision aid for colon cancer screening. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  M Pignone; R Harris; L Kinsinger
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 5.  Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Development and initial testing of a computer-based patient decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening for primary care practice.

Authors:  Jane Kim; Annie Whitney; Sarah Hayter; Carmen Lewis; Marci Campbell; Lisa Sutherland; Beth Fowler; Sue Googe; Regina McCoy; Michael Pignone
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  The uptake and effect of a mailed multi-modal colon cancer screening intervention: a pilot controlled trial.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Alison T Brenner; Jennifer M Griffith; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 7.327

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Calvin Franz; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Epigenetic silencing of protocadherin 10 in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xian Zhong; Hong Shen; Jianshan Mao; Jiawei Zhang; Weidong Han
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Alerts in electronic medical records to promote a colorectal cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  Carolina Guiriguet; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz; Andrea Burón; Irene Rivero; Jaume Grau; Carmen Vela-Vallespín; Mercedes Vilarrubí; Miquel Torres; Cristina Hernández; Leonardo Méndez-Boo; Pere Toràn; Llorenç Caballeria; Francesc Macià; Antoni Castells
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Effects of facilitated team meetings and learning collaboratives on colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care practices: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Eric K Shaw; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Alicja Piasecki; Shawna V Hudson; Jeanne M Ferrante; Reuben R McDaniel; Paul A Nutting; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Anxiety Associated with Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chengyue Yang; Vaelan Sriranjan; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; William Poluha; John R Walker; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Can an alert in primary care electronic medical records increase participation in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer? COLO-ALERT, a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Carolina Guiriguet-Capdevila; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz; Irene Rivero-Franco; Carme Vela-Vallespín; Mercedes Vilarrubí-Estrella; Miquel Torres-Salinas; Jaume Grau-Cano; Andrea Burón-Pust; Cristina Hernández-Rodríguez; Antonio Fuentes-Peláez; Dolores Reina-Rodríguez; Rosa De León-Gallo; Leonardo Mendez-Boo; Pere Torán-Monserrat
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans in Human Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Carolina Meloni Vicente; Daiana Aparecida da Silva; Priscila Veronica Sartorio; Tiago Donizetti Silva; Sarhan Sydney Saad; Helena Bonciani Nader; Nora Manoukian Forones; Leny Toma
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.916

8.  DNA methylation as an epigenetic biomarker in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tiago Donizetti Silva; Veronica Marques Vidigal; Aledson Vitor Felipe; Jacqueline Miranda DE Lima; Ricardo Artigiani Neto; Sarhan Sidney Saad; Nora Manoukian Forones
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 9.  "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Isabelle Scholl; Caroline Tietbohl; Mala Mann; Adrian G K Edwards; Catharine Clay; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Carmen L Lewis; Richard M Wexler; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.