Literature DB >> 19375266

Assessment of patient's experiences across the interface between primary and secondary care: Consumer Quality Index Continuum of care.

Annette J Berendsen1, Klaas H Groenier, G Majella de Jong, Betty Meyboom-de Jong, Willem Jan van der Veen, Janny Dekker, Margot W M de Waal, Jan Schuling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Development and validation of a questionnaire that measures patients' experiences of collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists.
METHODS: A questionnaire was developed using the method of the consumer quality index and validated in a cross-sectional study among a random sample of patients referred to medical specialists in the Netherlands. Validation included factor analysis, ascertain internal consistency, and the discriminative ability.
RESULTS: The response rate was 65% (1404 patients). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that four domains could be distinguished (i.e. GP Approach; GP Referral; Specialist; Collaboration). Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.51 to 0.93 indicating sufficient internal consistency to make comparison of groups of respondents possible. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the domains were <0.4, except between the domains GP Approach and GP Referral. All domains clearly produced discriminating scores for groups with different characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: The Consumer Quality Index (CQ-index) Continuum of Care can be a useful instrument to assess aspects of the collaboration between GPs and specialists from patients' perspective. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: It can be used to give feedback to both medical professionals and policy makers. Such feedback creates an opportunity for implementing specific improvements and evaluating quality improvement projects. 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19375266     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  9 in total

Review 1.  Instruments Measuring Integrated Care: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.

Authors:  Mary Ann C Bautista; Milawaty Nurjono; Yee Wei Lim; Ezra Dessers; Hubertus Jm Vrijhoef
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 2.  Continuum beliefs of mental illness: a systematic review of measures.

Authors:  S Tomczyk; S Schlick; T Gansler; T McLaren; H Muehlan; L-J Peter; G Schomerus; S Schmidt
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.519

3.  Patient satisfaction with a teleradiology service in general practice.

Authors:  Jac J W M Jacobs; Rianne Ekkelboom; Jan P A M Jacobs; Thys van der Molen; Robbert Sanderman
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations.

Authors:  P Vermeir; D Vandijck; S Degroote; R Peleman; R Verhaeghe; E Mortier; G Hallaert; S Van Daele; W Buylaert; D Vogelaers
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Effects of family group conferences among high-risk patients of chronic disability and their significant others: study protocol for a multicentre controlled trial.

Authors:  Chantal F Hillebregt; Eline W M Scholten; Marjolijn Ketelaar; Marcel W M Post; Johanna M A Visser-Meily
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Patient Participation and the Environment: A Scoping Review of Instruments.

Authors:  Maya Kylén; Ulla-Karin Schön; Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen; Marie Elf
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Quality of pharmaceutical care at the pharmacy counter: patients' experiences versus video observation.

Authors:  Ellen S Koster; Lyda Blom; Marloes R Overbeeke; Daphne Philbert; Marcia Vervloet; Laura Koopman; Liset van Dijk
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 8.  Measurement tools and outcome measures used in transitional patient safety; a systematic review.

Authors:  Marije A van Melle; Henk F van Stel; Judith M Poldervaart; Niek J de Wit; Dorien L M Zwart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey.

Authors:  Olaf Holmboe; Hilde Hestad Iversen; Kirsten Danielsen; Oyvind Bjertnaes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.