Literature DB >> 1937478

Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequencies differ between directly prepared cytotrophoblasts and cultured mesenchymal core cells.

L P Shulman1, L R Li, A T Tharapel, J L Simpson, S Elias.   

Abstract

Analysis of sister chromatid exchange (SCE) in chorionic villus cells may become useful in measuring the response of fetal tissues to clastogens or mutagens or for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome breakage syndromes such as Bloom syndrome. Previous studies have failed to analyze cytotrophoblastic cells and mesenchymal core cells, or have found no difference between SCE frequencies in directly prepared and cultured cells. Our data indicate significant differences in SCE frequencies between the two cell types: SCE frequency in directly prepared cytotrophoblasts was 6.73 SCE/cell +/- 1.6, whereas SCE frequency in cultured mesenchymal core cells was 10.31 SCE/cell +/- 0.49 (P less than 0.001). SCE analyses involving chorionic villi must take into account cell type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1937478     DOI: 10.1007/bf00201736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  10 in total

1.  Baseline and mutagen-induced sister-chromatid exchanges in cultures of human whole blood and purified fresh or frozen lymphocytes.

Authors:  H Murli; S M Galloway; J L Ivett; D M Parry; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Resorbed co-twin as an explanation for discrepant chorionic villus results: non-mosaic 47,XX,+16 in villi (direct and culture) with normal (46,XX) amniotic fluid and neonatal blood.

Authors:  A T Tharapel; S Elias; L P Shulman; L Seely; D S Emerson; J L Simpson
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  SCE variability in lymphocytes and fibroblasts. A controlled study.

Authors:  T Lukusa; P Vercauteren; H Van den Berghe; J J Cassiman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Cell cycle studies in chorionic villi.

Authors:  L Zahed; M Murer-Orlando; M Bobrow
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Bloom's syndrome. VII. Progress report for 1978.

Authors:  J German; D Bloom; E Passarge
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids.

Authors:  P Perry; S Wolff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and structural chromosome aberration in mutagenicity testing.

Authors:  E Gebhart
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Sister chromatid exchanges in first-trimester chorionic villi after in vivo and in vitro exposure to diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  P Carrera; S Orsini; G Terzoli; B Brambati; G Simoni
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.050

9.  Effects of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine concentration and alpha-naphthoflavone on the association between smoking and the frequency of sister-chromatid exchanges in lymphocytes from maternal and cord blood.

Authors:  K Lundgren; J M Lambert; D Schreinemachers; R B Everson
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Sister chromatid exchanges, indices of human chromosome damage and repair: detection by fluorescence and induction by mitomycin C.

Authors:  S A Latt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.