Literature DB >> 19374682

Nurse prescriber-patient consultations: a case study in dermatology.

Molly Courtenay1, Nicola Carey, Karen Stenner.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper is a report of a study exploring the content and processes in consultations between nurse prescribers and patients with dermatological conditions.
BACKGROUND: Communication skills, consultation time, information and follow-up are central to the treatment and management of patients with dermatological conditions. The contribution nurses make to the care of these patients has great potential.
METHOD: A multiple case study was conducted with 10 practice settings across England in which nurses prescribed medicines for patients with dermatological conditions. Data were collected between June 2006 and September 2007 using semi-structured interviews (n = 40), patient questionnaires (n = 165/200) and videotaped observations of nurse consultations (n = 40). Data analysis included thematic analysis, descriptive statistics, chi-square and non-parametric tests.
FINDINGS: Nurses believed that their holistic approach to assessment, combined with their prescribing knowledge, improved prescribing decisions. Listening and explanation of treatments were aspects of nurse communication that were rated highly by patients. Listening and dealing sensitively with emotions were also aspects of the videotaped consultations that were rated highly by assessors. Nurses were less consistent in providing information about medicines.
CONCLUSION: Triangulated data from this study suggest that nurse prescribing enhances the care of patients with dermatological conditions through improved prescribing decisions. If patients are to be more involved in this decision-making, nurses must give them more information about their medicines. The benefits of prescribing were most evident in the practices of dermatology specialist nurses. Further evidence is required to identify whether prescribing by specialist nurses offers similar benefits in other therapeutic areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19374682     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04974.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  6 in total

1.  An overiew of non medical prescribing across one strategic health authority: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Molly Courtenay; Nicola Carey; Karen Stenner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Non medical prescribing leads views on their role and the implementation of non medical prescribing from a multi-organisational perspective.

Authors:  Molly Courtenay; Nicola Carey; Karen Stenner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Facilitators and barriers to non-medical prescribing - A systematic review and thematic synthesis.

Authors:  Emma Graham-Clarke; Alison Rushton; Timothy Noblet; John Marriott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A comparative case study of prescribing and non-prescribing physiotherapists and podiatrists.

Authors:  Nicola Carey; Judith Edwards; Simon Otter; Heather Gage; Peter Williams; Molly Courtenay; Ann Moore; Karen Stenner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  A comparison of the clinical effectiveness and costs of mental health nurse supplementary prescribing and independent medical prescribing: a post-test control group study.

Authors:  Ian J Norman; Samantha Coster; Paul McCrone; Andrew Sibley; Cate Whittlesea
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review.

Authors:  Desirée Kozlowski; Marie Hutchinson; John Hurley; Joanne Rowley; Joanna Sutherland
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.