Literature DB >> 19373724

Fermented feed for laying hens: effects on egg production, egg quality, plumage condition and composition and activity of the intestinal microflora.

R M Engberg1, M Hammershøj, N F Johansen, M S Abousekken, S Steenfeldt, B B Jensen.   

Abstract

1. An experiment with a total of 480 hens (Babcock) was carried out from 16 to 38 weeks of age to evaluate the suitability of wet fermented feed (feed water ratio, 1:1.2-1:1.4) for layers, taking aspects of nutrition and gastrointestinal health into consideration. The production performance, egg shell quality, plumage condition, litter dry matter (DM) content, as well as the composition and activity of the intestinal microbial flora were analysed. 2. Fermented feed was characterised by a high concentration of lactic acid (160-250 mmol/kg feed) and a moderate level of acetic acid (20-30 mmol/kg feed), high numbers of lactic acid bacteria (log 9-10 CFU/g feed) and a pH of approximately 4.5. Feed fermentation reduced the concentration of dietary sugar from 32.1 to 7.3 g/kg DM and the phytate bound phosphorus from 2.7 to 1.9 g/kg DM. 3. Fermented feed seemed to loose attractiveness for the birds quite rapidly, resulting in a more aggressive behaviour and a poorer plumage condition than in birds given dry feed. The use of fermented feed reduced the litter DM content. 4. During the experimental period, the body weight gain of hens receiving fermented feed was 80 g higher than of hens fed the dry mash. Presumably because of an extended adaptation time to the feed, the onset of lay occurred later when hens were fed on fermented feed, resulting in non-significantly reduced total egg production (75 vs. 82%). 5. There was no significant difference between groups with respect to the total egg mass production (g/d/hen, 42 and 45 for fermented feed and dry mash, respectively). Throughout the experimental period, the feed DM intake of hens fed with fermented feed was lower than that of hens receiving the dry mash (110 vs. 125 g). From week 26 to 37, fermented feed improved the feed conversion as compared with the dry mash (g feed DM/g egg mass, 2.28 vs. 2.53). 6. The use of fermented feed increased egg weight in the period from 34 to 37 weeks (61.4 vs. 60.0) and increased shell weight (g/100 g egg weight, 10.2 vs. 9.9) and shell stiffness (N/mm, 161 vs. 150) of eggs collected at 37 weeks. 7. The feeding of fermented feed increased intestinal health by acidification of the upper digestive tract, forming a natural barrier towards infection with acid sensitive pathogens, e.g. E. coli, Salmonella and Campylobacter. 8. It was concluded that fermented wet feed offers potential benefits for health and nutrition, but may become suitable for layers only after the practical problems related to this feeding form have been overcome. However, an early adaptation of the birds during the rearing period seems to be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19373724     DOI: 10.1080/00071660902736722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  9 in total

1.  Bacterial Succession in the Broiler Gastrointestinal Tract.

Authors:  Samir Ranjitkar; Blair Lawley; Gerald Tannock; Ricarda M Engberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Exploring the Probiotic and Compound Feed Fermentative Applications of Lactobacillus plantarum SK1305 Isolated from Korean Green Chili Pickled Pepper.

Authors:  Kai-Min Niu; Damini Kothari; Sang-Buem Cho; Sung-Gu Han; In-Geun Song; Sam-Churl Kim; Soo-Ki Kim
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Pigs' Feed Fermentation Model with Antimicrobial Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains Combination by Changing Extruded Soya to Biomodified Local Feed Stock.

Authors:  Laurynas Vadopalas; Modestas Ruzauskas; Vita Lele; Vytaute Starkute; Paulina Zavistanaviciute; Egle Zokaityte; Vadims Bartkevics; Sarunas Badaras; Dovile Klupsaite; Erika Mozuriene; Agila Dauksiene; Sonata Sidlauskiene; Romas Gruzauskas; Elena Bartkiene
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Probiotic Fermented Feed Alleviates Liver Fat Deposition in Shaoxing Ducks via Modulating Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Tiantian Gu; Mingcai Duan; Ruikun Zhang; Tao Zeng; Wenwu Xu; Weifeng Feng; Chunqing Jiang; Yong Tian; Li Chen; Lizhi Lu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 5.  Welfare issues and potential solutions for laying hens in free range and organic production systems: A review based on literature and interviews.

Authors:  Claire Bonnefous; Anne Collin; Laurence A Guilloteau; Vanessa Guesdon; Christine Filliat; Sophie Réhault-Godbert; T Bas Rodenburg; Frank A M Tuyttens; Laura Warin; Sanna Steenfeldt; Lisa Baldinger; Martina Re; Raffaella Ponzio; Anna Zuliani; Pietro Venezia; Minna Väre; Patricia Parrott; Keith Walley; Jarkko K Niemi; Christine Leterrier
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-05

6.  Fermented Rapeseed Meal as a Component of the Mink Diet (Neovison vison) Modulating the Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota.

Authors:  Łukasz Wlazło; Bożena Nowakowicz-Dębek; Anna Czech; Anna Chmielowiec-Korzeniowska; Mateusz Ossowski; Marek Kułażyński; Marcin Łukaszewicz; Anna Krasowska
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Intestinal microbial ecology and hematological parameters of broiler fed cassava waste pulp fermented with Acremonium charticola.

Authors:  Sugiharto Sugiharto; Turrini Yudiarti; Isroli Isroli; Endang Widiastuti; Fatan Dwi Putra
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-03-18

8.  Influence of feeding crimped kernel maize silage on the course of subclinical necrotic enteritis in a broiler disease model.

Authors:  Nisha Sharma; Samir Ranjitkar; Nishchal K Sharma; Ricarda M Engberg
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2017-07-19

9.  Effects of graded levels of microbial fermented or enzymatically treated dried brewer's grains on growth, digestive and nutrient transporter genes expression and cost effectiveness in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Hanan S Al-Khalaifah; Sara E Shahin; Anaam E Omar; Haiam A Mohammed; Hala I Mahmoud; Doaa Ibrahim
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.741

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.