Literature DB >> 19373479

Mid-term outcome of GSB-III total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with post-traumatic arthritis.

Rouin Amirfeyz1, Neil Blewitt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We reviewed the mid-term outcome of GSB-III semi-constrained total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and compared the results of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and those suffering from post-traumatic arthritis (PTA). PATIENTS: Forty-five patients with 54 replaced elbows, with an average age of 69 (range 49-84) were clinically [using Mayo Clinical Performance Index (MCPI) and Liverpool Elbow Score (LES)] and radiographically assessed. The average follow-up was 54 (range 20-103) months.
RESULTS: Based on MCPI 82% of patients had excellent or good outcome. This figure was 88% for RA and 64% for PTA group (P = 0.22). Overall MCPI was 83.7(+/- 19) and LES 7.5 (+/- 1.8). Neither the MCPI (P = 0.39) nor the LES (P = 0.95) were statistically different between the RA and PTA groups. The mid-term outcome of GSB-III TEA is satisfactory.
CONCLUSION: The recommendation of TEA, including in patients with PTA, is supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19373479     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0876-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  7 in total

1.  Trends in total elbow arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis in Germany from 2005 to 2014.

Authors:  Alexander Klug; Yves Gramlich; Johannes Buckup; Uwe Schweigkofler; Reinhard Hoffmann; Kay Schmidt-Horlohé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Cementation technique for elbow arthroplasty; an international survey.

Authors:  Tariq A Kwaees; Rohit Singhal; Denise Eygendaal; Charalambos P Charalambous
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-07-01

3.  Validation of the Liverpool Elbow Score for evaluation of elbow stiffness.

Authors:  Ziyang Sun; Cunyi Fan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  RESULTS FROM BI-CONTACT(®) TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: MULTICENTER STUDY.

Authors:  Eduardo Benegas; Eduardo Angeli Malavolta; Mauro Emilio Conforto Gracitelli; Augusto Tadeu Barros de Sousa; Alberto Naoki Miyazaki; Marcelo Fregoneze; Roberto Yukio Ikemoto; Joel Murachovsky; Marcelo Hide Matsumoto; Marcel Jun Sugawara Tamaoki; Arnaldo Amado Ferreira Neto
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06

5.  Minimal clinically important difference of Liverpool Elbow Score in elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Omid Alizadehkhaiyat; Graham J Kemp; Simon P Frostick
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2017-08-30

6.  Outcomes following total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis versus post-traumatic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jou-Hua Wang; Hsuan-Hsiao Ma; Te-Feng A Chou; Shang-Wen Tsai; Cheng-Fong Chen; Po-Kuei Wu; Wei-Ming Chen
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 7.  Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Revision Surgery.

Authors:  Jae-Man Kwak; Kyoung-Hwan Koh; In-Ho Jeon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.