Sergei V Gulnik1, Michael Eissenstat. 1. Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA. sergei.gulnuik@sequoiapharma.com
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes current approaches to HIV protease inhibitor design, with a focus on improving their profile against drug-resistant mutants. Potential explanations for the flat resistance profile of some potent protease inhibitors and discrepancies between the apparent fold change of potency at the enzyme level and in cell-based assays are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite new ideas and a clear rationale for designing inhibitors that bind outside the enzyme active site, all current protease inhibitors with potent antiviral activity target this site. Several bis-tetrahydrofuran-containing compounds including darunavir, brecanavir, GS-8374, and Sequoia protease inhibitors exhibit excellent potency against mutant HIV strains that are resistant to clinically used protease inhibitors. The apparently flat resistance profiles of these and some other protease inhibitors may, at least in part, be explained by their high potency against wild-type enzyme. The substrate envelope and solvent-anchoring hypotheses have been used to design and/or rationalize improved resistance profiles. Traditional approaches yielded a lysine sulfonamide PL-100 with a unique resistance profile. SUMMARY: Several theories on how to design HIV protease inhibitors with improved resistance profiles have been proposed during the review period. The general concepts that are incorporated into most design strategies include maximizing the interactions with the backbone and conserved side chains of the enzyme while minimizing inhibitor size and maintaining conformational flexibility to allow for modified binding modes.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes current approaches to HIV protease inhibitor design, with a focus on improving their profile against drug-resistant mutants. Potential explanations for the flat resistance profile of some potent protease inhibitors and discrepancies between the apparent fold change of potency at the enzyme level and in cell-based assays are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite new ideas and a clear rationale for designing inhibitors that bind outside the enzyme active site, all current protease inhibitors with potent antiviral activity target this site. Several bis-tetrahydrofuran-containing compounds including darunavir, brecanavir, GS-8374, and Sequoia protease inhibitors exhibit excellent potency against mutant HIV strains that are resistant to clinically used protease inhibitors. The apparently flat resistance profiles of these and some other protease inhibitors may, at least in part, be explained by their high potency against wild-type enzyme. The substrate envelope and solvent-anchoring hypotheses have been used to design and/or rationalize improved resistance profiles. Traditional approaches yielded a lysine sulfonamidePL-100 with a unique resistance profile. SUMMARY: Several theories on how to design HIV protease inhibitors with improved resistance profiles have been proposed during the review period. The general concepts that are incorporated into most design strategies include maximizing the interactions with the backbone and conserved side chains of the enzyme while minimizing inhibitor size and maintaining conformational flexibility to allow for modified binding modes.
Authors: Madhavi N L Nalam; Akbar Ali; G S Kiran Kumar Reddy; Hong Cao; Saima G Anjum; Michael D Altman; Nese Kurt Yilmaz; Bruce Tidor; Tariq M Rana; Celia A Schiffer Journal: Chem Biol Date: 2013-09-05
Authors: Ashley N Matthew; Florian Leidner; Gordon J Lockbaum; Mina Henes; Jacqueto Zephyr; Shurong Hou; Desaboini Nageswara Rao; Jennifer Timm; Linah N Rusere; Debra A Ragland; Janet L Paulsen; Kristina Prachanronarong; Djade I Soumana; Ellen A Nalivaika; Nese Kurt Yilmaz; Akbar Ali; Celia A Schiffer Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Akbar Ali; Rajintha M Bandaranayake; Yufeng Cai; Nancy M King; Madhavi Kolli; Seema Mittal; Jennifer F Murzycki; Madhavi N L Nalam; Ellen A Nalivaika; Ayşegül Özen; Moses M Prabu-Jeyabalan; Kelly Thayer; Celia A Schiffer Journal: Viruses Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 5.818