Laura Dickinson1, Saye Khoo, David Back. 1. Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GF, UK. laurad@liv.ac.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pharmacokinetic and drug-drug interaction studies are conducted in both healthy volunteers and the target population (HIV-infected patients), but there is little discussion of the potential for differences in drug disposition between the two groups. It is important to recognize that the pharmacokinetics of drugs may be altered in HIV-infected persons as compared with healthy individuals. The aim of this review is to highlight some of the important differences in drug handling between healthy volunteers and HIV-infected individuals, focusing on protease inhibitors. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies aimed at characterizing disparities in pharmacokinetics between healthy volunteers and HIV patients are lacking. Data suggest that concentrations of some protease inhibitors are lower in HIV patients than in HIV-negative volunteers (atazanavir and tipranavir), but generally comparisons are made across studies and study centres, and so multiple variables, such as differences in food and study design, can influence findings. We have conducted an 'in-house' analysis, comparing atazanavir, lopinavir and saquinavir between HIV-infected patients and healthy volunteers enrolled in the same study centre with similar study designs. SUMMARY: For atazanavir the current data are quite convincing that concentrations are lower in HIV-infected patients than in healthy individuals, but for others it is not so clear. The 'in-house' analyses for atazanavir, lopinavir and saquinavir attempted to address some of the difficulties with cross-study comparisons, but it should be noted that subject numbers were small. Physiological changes resulting from HIV disease can influence drug pharmacokinetics and the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pharmacokinetic and drug-drug interaction studies are conducted in both healthy volunteers and the target population (HIV-infectedpatients), but there is little discussion of the potential for differences in drug disposition between the two groups. It is important to recognize that the pharmacokinetics of drugs may be altered in HIV-infectedpersons as compared with healthy individuals. The aim of this review is to highlight some of the important differences in drug handling between healthy volunteers and HIV-infected individuals, focusing on protease inhibitors. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies aimed at characterizing disparities in pharmacokinetics between healthy volunteers and HIVpatients are lacking. Data suggest that concentrations of some protease inhibitors are lower in HIVpatients than in HIV-negative volunteers (atazanavir and tipranavir), but generally comparisons are made across studies and study centres, and so multiple variables, such as differences in food and study design, can influence findings. We have conducted an 'in-house' analysis, comparing atazanavir, lopinavir and saquinavir between HIV-infectedpatients and healthy volunteers enrolled in the same study centre with similar study designs. SUMMARY: For atazanavir the current data are quite convincing that concentrations are lower in HIV-infectedpatients than in healthy individuals, but for others it is not so clear. The 'in-house' analyses for atazanavir, lopinavir and saquinavir attempted to address some of the difficulties with cross-study comparisons, but it should be noted that subject numbers were small. Physiological changes resulting from HIV disease can influence drug pharmacokinetics and the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated.
Authors: Jackson K Mukonzo; Sarah Nanzigu; Dinko Rekić; Paul Waako; Daniel Röshammar; Michael Ashton; Jasper Ogwal-Okeng; Lars L Gustafsson; Eleni Aklillu Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Akil Jackson; Andrew Hill; Rebekah Puls; Laura Else; Janaki Amin; David Back; Enmoore Lin; Saye Khoo; Sean Emery; Roland Morley; Brian Gazzard; Marta Boffito Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2010-12-17 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Honghu Liu; Eric Daar; Yan Wang; Lisa Siqueiros; Kayla Campbell; Jie Shen; Mario Guerrero; Meng-Wei Ko; Di Xiong; John Dao; Todd Young; Marc Rosen; Courtney V Fletcher Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Mark A Wallet; Caroline M Reist; Julie C Williams; Sofia Appelberg; Giorgio L Guiulfo; Brent Gardner; John W Sleasman; Maureen M Goodenow Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Xiaodong Wang; Marta Boffito; Jenny Zhang; Ellen Chung; Li Zhu; Yaoshi Wu; Kristine Patterson; Angela Kashuba; Pablo Tebas; Michael Child; Lisa Mahnke; Richard Bertz Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2011-07-19 Impact factor: 5.078