UNLABELLED: A variety of phosphodiesterases hydrolyze and terminate the effects of the intracellular second messenger 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Phosphodiesterase subtype 4 (PDE4) is particularly abundant in the brain and has been imaged with (11)C-(R)-rolipram, a selective inhibitor of PDE4. We sought to measure in vivo both the binding site density (B(max)) and the radioligand affinity (1/K(D)) of (11)C-(R)-rolipram in the rat brain. We also studied 2 critical factors in small-animal PET scans: the influence of anesthesia and the difference in binding under in vivo and in vitro conditions. METHODS: In vivo, B(max) and K(D) were measured in PET saturation experiments by the administration of (11)C-(R)-rolipram and various doses of carrier (R)-rolipram in conscious and isoflurane-anesthetized rats. The metabolite-corrected arterial input function was measured in each scan. To image conscious rats, the head of the rat was fixed in a holder and the animals were trained to comply with this apparatus. Bound and free (R)-rolipram levels were calculated under transient equilibrium conditions (i.e., at the time of peak specific binding). RESULTS: The B(max) and K(D) of conscious rats were significantly greater than those of anesthetized rats, by 29% and 59%, respectively. In addition, the in vitro K(D) was 3-7 times greater than was the in vivo K(D), although the B(max) was similar in both conditions. CONCLUSION: The in vivo B(max) and K(D) of (R)-rolipram were successfully measured in both conscious and anesthetized rats. K(D) was affected to a greater extent than was B(max) by the 2 conditions. That is, K(D) was increased in the conscious rat, compared with in the anesthetized rat, and K(D) was increased in vitro, compared with in vivo. The current study shows that the rat, a readily available species for research, can be used to measure in vivo both affinity and density of radioligand targets, which can later be directly assessed with standard in vitro techniques.
UNLABELLED: A variety of phosphodiesterases hydrolyze and terminate the effects of the intracellular second messenger 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Phosphodiesterase subtype 4 (PDE4) is particularly abundant in the brain and has been imaged with (11)C-(R)-rolipram, a selective inhibitor of PDE4. We sought to measure in vivo both the binding site density (B(max)) and the radioligand affinity (1/K(D)) of (11)C-(R)-rolipram in the rat brain. We also studied 2 critical factors in small-animal PET scans: the influence of anesthesia and the difference in binding under in vivo and in vitro conditions. METHODS: In vivo, B(max) and K(D) were measured in PET saturation experiments by the administration of (11)C-(R)-rolipram and various doses of carrier (R)-rolipram in conscious and isoflurane-anesthetized rats. The metabolite-corrected arterial input function was measured in each scan. To image conscious rats, the head of the rat was fixed in a holder and the animals were trained to comply with this apparatus. Bound and free (R)-rolipram levels were calculated under transient equilibrium conditions (i.e., at the time of peak specific binding). RESULTS: The B(max) and K(D) of conscious rats were significantly greater than those of anesthetized rats, by 29% and 59%, respectively. In addition, the in vitro K(D) was 3-7 times greater than was the in vivo K(D), although the B(max) was similar in both conditions. CONCLUSION: The in vivo B(max) and K(D) of (R)-rolipram were successfully measured in both conscious and anesthetized rats. K(D) was affected to a greater extent than was B(max) by the 2 conditions. That is, K(D) was increased in the conscious rat, compared with in the anesthetized rat, and K(D) was increased in vitro, compared with in vivo. The current study shows that the rat, a readily available species for research, can be used to measure in vivo both affinity and density of radioligand targets, which can later be directly assessed with standard in vitro techniques.
Authors: Jean N DaSilva; Celia M Lourenco; Jeffrey H Meyer; Douglas Hussey; William Z Potter; Sylvain Houle Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2002-10-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Petra Schweinhardt; Peter Fransson; Lars Olson; Christian Spenger; Jesper L R Andersson Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2003-10-30 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Mireille Lortie; Jean N DaSilva; Miran Kenk; Stephanie Thorn; Darryl Davis; David Birnie; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Daniela Schulz; Sudeepti Southekal; Sachin S Junnarkar; Jean-François Pratte; Martin L Purschke; Sean P Stoll; Bosky Ravindranath; Sri Harsha Maramraju; Srilalan Krishnamoorthy; Fritz A Henn; Paul O'Connor; Craig L Woody; David J Schlyer; Paul Vaska Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2011-03-13 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Lora D Weidner; Yuichi Wakabayashi; Louise A Stolz; Michael T Collins; Lori Guthrie; Milalynn Victorino; Joyce Chung; William Miller; Sami S Zoghbi; Victor W Pike; Masahiro Fujita; Robert B Innis; Alison M Boyce Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 11.082