BACKGROUND: Recurrent 15q13.3 microdeletions were recently identified with identical proximal (BP4) and distal (BP5) breakpoints and associated with mild to moderate mental retardation and epilepsy. METHODS: To assess further the clinical implications of this novel 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome, 18 new probands with a deletion were molecularly and clinically characterised. In addition, we evaluated the characteristics of a family with a more proximal deletion between BP3 and BP4. Finally, four patients with a duplication in the BP3-BP4-BP5 region were included in this study to ascertain the clinical significance of duplications in this region. RESULTS: The 15q13.3 microdeletion in our series was associated with a highly variable intra- and inter-familial phenotype. At least 11 of the 18 deletions identified were inherited. Moreover, 7 of 10 siblings from four different families also had this deletion: one had a mild developmental delay, four had only learning problems during childhood, but functioned well in daily life as adults, whereas the other two had no learning problems at all. In contrast to previous findings, seizures were not a common feature in our series (only 2 of 17 living probands). Three patients with deletions had cardiac defects and deletion of the KLF13 gene, located in the critical region, may contribute to these abnormalities. The limited data from the single family with the more proximal BP3-BP4 deletion suggest this deletion may have little clinical significance. Patients with duplications of the BP3-BP4-BP5 region did not share a recognisable phenotype, but psychiatric disease was noted in 2 of 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings broaden the phenotypic spectrum associated with 15q13.3 deletions and suggest that, in some individuals, deletion of 15q13.3 is not sufficient to cause disease. The existence of microdeletion syndromes, associated with an unpredictable and variable phenotypic outcome, will pose the clinician with diagnostic difficulties and challenge the commonly used paradigm in the diagnostic setting that aberrations inherited from a phenotypically normal parent are usually without clinical consequences.
BACKGROUND: Recurrent 15q13.3 microdeletions were recently identified with identical proximal (BP4) and distal (BP5) breakpoints and associated with mild to moderate mental retardation and epilepsy. METHODS: To assess further the clinical implications of this novel 15q13.3 microdeletion syndrome, 18 new probands with a deletion were molecularly and clinically characterised. In addition, we evaluated the characteristics of a family with a more proximal deletion between BP3 and BP4. Finally, four patients with a duplication in the BP3-BP4-BP5 region were included in this study to ascertain the clinical significance of duplications in this region. RESULTS: The 15q13.3 microdeletion in our series was associated with a highly variable intra- and inter-familial phenotype. At least 11 of the 18 deletions identified were inherited. Moreover, 7 of 10 siblings from four different families also had this deletion: one had a mild developmental delay, four had only learning problems during childhood, but functioned well in daily life as adults, whereas the other two had no learning problems at all. In contrast to previous findings, seizures were not a common feature in our series (only 2 of 17 living probands). Three patients with deletions had cardiac defects and deletion of the KLF13 gene, located in the critical region, may contribute to these abnormalities. The limited data from the single family with the more proximal BP3-BP4 deletion suggest this deletion may have little clinical significance. Patients with duplications of the BP3-BP4-BP5 region did not share a recognisable phenotype, but psychiatric disease was noted in 2 of 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings broaden the phenotypic spectrum associated with 15q13.3 deletions and suggest that, in some individuals, deletion of 15q13.3 is not sufficient to cause disease. The existence of microdeletion syndromes, associated with an unpredictable and variable phenotypic outcome, will pose the clinician with diagnostic difficulties and challenge the commonly used paradigm in the diagnostic setting that aberrations inherited from a phenotypically normal parent are usually without clinical consequences.
Authors: Andrew J Sharp; Devin P Locke; Sean D McGrath; Ze Cheng; Jeffrey A Bailey; Rhea U Vallente; Lisa M Pertz; Royden A Clark; Stuart Schwartz; Rick Segraves; Vanessa V Oseroff; Donna G Albertson; Daniel Pinkel; Evan E Eichler Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2005-05-25 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Bert B A de Vries; Rolph Pfundt; Martijn Leisink; David A Koolen; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Irene M Janssen; Simon van Reijmersdal; Willy M Nillesen; Erik H L P G Huys; Nicole de Leeuw; Dominique Smeets; Erik A Sistermans; Ton Feuth; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Han G Brunner; Joris A Veltman Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2005-08-30 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Lionel Willatt; James Cox; John Barber; Elisabet Dachs Cabanas; Amanda Collins; Dian Donnai; David R FitzPatrick; Eddy Maher; Howard Martin; Josep Parnau; Lesley Pindar; Jacqueline Ramsay; Charles Shaw-Smith; Erik A Sistermans; Michael Tettenborn; Dorothy Trump; Bert B A de Vries; Kate Walker; F Lucy Raymond Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2005-05-25 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: B A Neubauer; B Fiedler; B Himmelein; F Kämpfer; U Lässker; G Schwabe; I Spanier; D Tams; C Bretscher; K Moldenhauer; G Kurlemann; S Weise; K Tedroff; O Eeg-Olofsson; C Wadelius; U Stephani Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: David M Alvarado; Hyuliya Aferol; Kevin McCall; Jason B Huang; Matthew Techy; Jillian Buchan; Janet Cady; Patrick R Gonzales; Matthew B Dobbs; Christina A Gurnett Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2010-07-09 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Zhishuo Ou; Paweł Stankiewicz; Zhilian Xia; Amy M Breman; Brian Dawson; Joanna Wiszniewska; Przemyslaw Szafranski; M Lance Cooper; Mitchell Rao; Lina Shao; Sarah T South; Karlene Coleman; Paul M Fernhoff; Marcel J Deray; Sally Rosengren; Elizabeth R Roeder; Victoria B Enciso; A Craig Chinault; Ankita Patel; Sung-Hae L Kang; Chad A Shaw; James R Lupski; Sau W Cheung Journal: Genome Res Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Przemyslaw Szafranski; Christian P Schaaf; Richard E Person; Ian B Gibson; Zhilian Xia; Sangeetha Mahadevan; Joanna Wiszniewska; Carlos A Bacino; Seema Lalani; Lorraine Potocki; Sung-Hae Kang; Ankita Patel; Sau Wai Cheung; Frank J Probst; Brett H Graham; Marwan Shinawi; Arthur L Beaudet; Pawel Stankiewicz Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Erwin Brosens; Florian Marsch; Elisabeth M de Jong; Hitisha P Zaveri; Alina C Hilger; Vera Gisela Choinitzki; Alice Hölscher; Per Hoffmann; Stefan Herms; Thomas M Boemers; Benno M Ure; Martin Lacher; Michael Ludwig; Bert H Eussen; Robert M van der Helm; Hannie Douben; Diane Van Opstal; Rene M H Wijnen; H Berna Beverloo; Yolande van Bever; Alice S Brooks; Hanneke IJsselstijn; Daryl A Scott; Johannes Schumacher; Dick Tibboel; Heiko Reutter; Annelies de Klein Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Saul A Mullen; Gemma L Carvill; Susannah Bellows; Marta A Bayly; Holger Trucks; Dennis Lal; Thoman Sander; Samuel F Berkovic; Leanne M Dibbens; Ingrid E Scheffer; Heather C Mefford Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jiani Yin; Wu Chen; Eugene S Chao; Sirena Soriano; Li Wang; Wei Wang; Steven E Cummock; Huifang Tao; Kaifang Pang; Zhandong Liu; Fred A Pereira; Rodney C Samaco; Huda Y Zoghbi; Mingshan Xue; Christian P Schaaf Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 11.025