OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve surgery for organic mitral regurgitation (MR) in the elderly has been debated. In the elderly, quality of life is a better indicator of surgical success than survival. We assessed quality of life of elderly patients submitted to surgery for MR using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) questionnaire. METHODS: Between August 2003 and August 2006, 225 consecutive patients >70 years old underwent surgical treatment of organic MR. Mean age was 77 +/- 3.3 years (range 71-87 years). Mean EF was 50 +/- 11%. Degenerative disease was the most prevalent (77%) etiology. CABG was associated in 25% of patients. Mean Charlson score was 4.3 +/- 1.5 and 101 patients (45%) were NYHA class III and IV. Hospital survivors were followed up and quality of life by MLHF score was assessed. RESULTS: Mitral repair and replacement were equally distributed in this population. Hospital mortality was 2.7%. Late survival was 91 +/- 1.9% at 3 years. MLHF was obtained from 204 patients at mean 2 +/- 1 years of follow-up. MLHF score was 38 +/- 18; there were 135 (66%) patients with MLHF >30. MLHF tended to increase with age at follow-up (p = 0.007). Multivariable predictors of MLHF were preoperative atrial fibrillation (p = 0.019), diabetes (p = 0.03), higher creatinine level (p = 0.0009), higher EuroSCORE (p = 0.02), residual mitral regurgitation grade at follow-up echocardiography (p < 0.0001) and systolic pulmonary artery pressure at follow-up (p = 0.04). Type of surgical treatment (repair vs replacement and choice of prosthesis) did not predict MLHF at follow-up, although those who had recurrent MR after repair had the highest scores compared to patients who had repair and durable result and those treated by replacement (MLHF was 51 +/- 21, vs 34 +/- 16, vs 39 +/- 18, respectively, p = 0.0013). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life following mitral valve surgery is suboptimal in more than half of elderly patients. MLHF score at follow-up is mostly related to preoperative conditions. Type of surgery does not influence MLHF score, however, quality of life is worse in patients with recurrent/residual MR following repair.
OBJECTIVE: Mitral valve surgery for organic mitral regurgitation (MR) in the elderly has been debated. In the elderly, quality of life is a better indicator of surgical success than survival. We assessed quality of life of elderly patients submitted to surgery for MR using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) questionnaire. METHODS: Between August 2003 and August 2006, 225 consecutive patients >70 years old underwent surgical treatment of organic MR. Mean age was 77 +/- 3.3 years (range 71-87 years). Mean EF was 50 +/- 11%. Degenerative disease was the most prevalent (77%) etiology. CABG was associated in 25% of patients. Mean Charlson score was 4.3 +/- 1.5 and 101 patients (45%) were NYHA class III and IV. Hospital survivors were followed up and quality of life by MLHF score was assessed. RESULTS: Mitral repair and replacement were equally distributed in this population. Hospital mortality was 2.7%. Late survival was 91 +/- 1.9% at 3 years. MLHF was obtained from 204 patients at mean 2 +/- 1 years of follow-up. MLHF score was 38 +/- 18; there were 135 (66%) patients with MLHF >30. MLHF tended to increase with age at follow-up (p = 0.007). Multivariable predictors of MLHF were preoperative atrial fibrillation (p = 0.019), diabetes (p = 0.03), higher creatinine level (p = 0.0009), higher EuroSCORE (p = 0.02), residual mitral regurgitation grade at follow-up echocardiography (p < 0.0001) and systolic pulmonary artery pressure at follow-up (p = 0.04). Type of surgical treatment (repair vs replacement and choice of prosthesis) did not predict MLHF at follow-up, although those who had recurrent MR after repair had the highest scores compared to patients who had repair and durable result and those treated by replacement (MLHF was 51 +/- 21, vs 34 +/- 16, vs 39 +/- 18, respectively, p = 0.0013). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life following mitral valve surgery is suboptimal in more than half of elderly patients. MLHF score at follow-up is mostly related to preoperative conditions. Type of surgery does not influence MLHF score, however, quality of life is worse in patients with recurrent/residual MR following repair.
Authors: Julie Sanders; Tracey Bowden; Nicholas Woolfe-Loftus; Mandeep Sekhon; Leanne M Aitken Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Anthony Alozie; Liliya Paranskaya; Bernd Westphal; Alexander Kaminski; Mohammad Sherif; Magnus Sindt; Stephan Kische; Jochen Schubert; Doreen Diedrich; Hüseyin Ince; Gustav Steinhoff; Alper Öner Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 2.298