Literature DB >> 19372017

The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies.

Iveta Simera1, David Moher, John Hoey, Kenneth F Schulz, Douglas G Altman.   

Abstract

Poorly reported research seriously undermines the usability of reported findings and misleads clinicians, researchers, policy makers and, ultimately, patients. Guidelines for reporting health research are available but they are not widely used. The EQUATOR Network is an international initiative that aims to systematically tackle the problems of poor reporting. The main goals of the EQUATOR Network are to improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of scientific publications by providing resources and education relating to the reporting of health research and assisting in the development, dissemination and implementation of robust reporting guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19372017     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  17 in total

1.  The Impact of Information Presentation and Cognitive Dissonance on Processing Systematic Review Summaries: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Bicycle Helmet Legislation.

Authors:  Benoît Béchard; Joachim Kimmerle; Justin Lawarée; Pierre-Oliver Bédard; Sharon E Straus; Mathieu Ouimet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Tips for charting the course of a successful health research career.

Authors:  Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Frederick Morfaw; John-Eudes L Kunda; Jackson K Mukonzo; Jasmine Kastner; Shiyuan Zhang; Madzouka Kokolo; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-04-24

3.  Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices.

Authors:  Carol Bennett; Sara Khangura; Jamie C Brehaut; Ian D Graham; David Moher; Beth K Potter; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Reporting experiments in homeopathic basic research-description of the checklist development.

Authors:  B Stock-Schröer; H Albrecht; L Betti; G Dobos; C Endler; K Linde; R Lüdtke; F Musial; R van Wijk; C Witt; S Baumgartner
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting Guidelines.

Authors:  Stuart G Nicholls; Pauline Quach; Erik von Elm; Astrid Guttmann; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Henrik T Sørensen; Liam Smeeth; Sinéad M Langan; Eric I Benchimol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of "Instructions for Authors".

Authors:  Matthew T Sims; Nolan M Henning; C Cole Wayant; Matt Vassar
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Research data management in health and biomedical citizen science: practices and prospects.

Authors:  Ann Borda; Kathleen Gray; Yuqing Fu
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2019-12-09

8.  Development of the standards of reporting of neurological disorders (STROND) checklist: a guideline for the reporting of incidence and prevalence studies in neuroepidemiology.

Authors:  Derrick A Bennett; Carol Brayne; Valery L Feigin; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Michael Brainin; Daniel Davis; Valentina Gallo; Nathalie Jetté; André Karch; John F Kurtzke; Pablo M Lavados; Giancarlo Logroscino; Gabriele Nagel; Pierre-Marie Preux; Peter M Rothwell; Lawrence W Svenson
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Reporting quality of studies using machine learning models for medical diagnosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mohamed Yusuf; Ignacio Atal; Jacques Li; Philip Smith; Philippe Ravaud; Martin Fergie; Michael Callaghan; James Selfe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Benjamin Speich; Sara Schroter; Matthias Briel; David Moher; Iratxe Puebla; Alejandra Clark; Michael Maia Schlüssel; Philippe Ravaud; Isabelle Boutron; Sally Hopewell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.