Literature DB >> 19371937

Effect of obesity on urethroplasty outcome.

Benjamin N Breyer1, Jack W McAninch, Jared M Whitson, Michael L Eisenberg, Viraj A Master, Bryan B Voelzke, Sean P Elliott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether obesity increases the risk of urethroplasty failure.
METHODS: A total of 381 patients underwent urethroplasty and had complete body mass index (BMI) data. Stricture recurrence-free survival was defined as subjective and objective improvement in urinary flow, an absence of radiographic evidence of stricture, and no further need for urethral instrumentation. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify both univariate and multivariate predictors of urethroplasty outcome.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 40 years (range 18-90). The median follow-up was 5.9 years (range 1 month to 10 years). Of the 381 patients, 60 developed recurrent stricture (15.7%). Overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m(2)) and obese (BMI 30-35 kg/m(2)) patients were more likely to have urethroplasty failure, reaching significance and near significance on univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively (P = .03 and P = .07, respectively). Patients who were severely (BMI 35-40 kg/m(2)) or morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m(2)) did not have an increased risk of urethroplasty failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Although obesity's relationship with urethroplasty failure is not linear, it does appear to affect outcomes after urethroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19371937      PMCID: PMC4113077          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  The public health impact of obesity.

Authors:  T L Visscher; J C Seidell
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Ponderal index as a predictor of postoperative complications.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Primary urethral reconstruction: the cost minimized approach to the bulbous urethral stricture.

Authors:  Keith F Rourke; Gerald H Jordan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Complications related to the high lithotomy position during urethral reconstruction.

Authors:  J G Anema; A F Morey; J W McAninch; L A Mario; H Wessells
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Male urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Richard A Santucci; Geoffrey F Joyce; Matthew Wise
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Incidence of urethral stricture after primary treatment for prostate cancer: data From CaPSURE.

Authors:  Sean P Elliott; Maxwell V Meng; Eric P Elkin; Jack W McAninch; Janeen Duchane; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Impact of body mass index on radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Cheryl T Lee; Rodney L Dunn; Bert T Chen; Daya P Joshi; Jaqueline Sheffield; James E Montie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  The impact of obesity in urology.

Authors:  Jack H Mydlo
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.241

9.  Prospective evaluation of the American Urological Association symptom index and peak urinary flow rate for the followup of men with known urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  C F Heyns; D C Marais
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Obesity and prostate cancer: epidemiology and clinical implications.

Authors:  W Cooper Buschemeyer; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of the Recurrent Male Urethral Stricture.

Authors:  Uwais B Zaid; Garjae Lavien; Andrew C Peterson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Impact of graft position on failure of single-stage bulbar urethroplasties with buccal mucosa graft.

Authors:  Bradley D Figler; Bahaa S Malaeb; Geolani W Dy; Bryan B Voelzke; Hunter Wessells
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Preoperative and intraoperative factors predictive of complications and stricture recurrence following multiple urethroplasty techniques.

Authors:  H E Kay; P Srikanth; A V Srivastava; A N Tijerina; V R Patel; N Hauser; A A Laviana; J S Wolf; E C Osterberg
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2021-03-10

4.  The UREThRAL stricture score: A novel method for describing anterior urethral strictures.

Authors:  Lucas R Wiegand; Steven B Brandes
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Effect of body mass index on recurrence following urethroplasty.

Authors:  David E Rapp; James T Mills; Luriel I Smith-Harrison; Ryan P Smith; Raymond A Costabile
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-08

6.  Histopathologic and clinical comparison of recurrent and non-recurrent urethral stricture disease treated by reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Iryna V Samarska; Hasan Dani; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Arthur L Burnett; Andres Matoso
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10

7.  Assessment of long term outcomes after buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty: the impact of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Ajay Aggarwal; Siddharth Pandey; Samarth Agarwal; Satya Narayan Sankhwar
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  Larger patients shouldn't have fewer options: urethroplasty is safe in the obese.

Authors:  Jordan Alger; Henry Collier Wright; Sameer Desale; Krishnan Venkatesan
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.