Literature DB >> 19371788

Implicit reference-based group-wise image registration and its application to structural and functional MRI.

Xiujuan Geng1, Gary E Christensen, Hong Gu, Thomas J Ross, Yihong Yang.   

Abstract

In this study, an implicit reference group-wise (IRG) registration with a small deformation, linear elastic model was used to jointly estimate correspondences between a set of MRI images. The performance of pair-wise and group-wise registration algorithms was evaluated for spatial normalization of structural and functional MRI data. Traditional spatial normalization is accomplished by group-to-reference (G2R) registration in which a group of images are registered pair-wise to a reference image. G2R registration is limited due to bias associated with selecting a reference image. In contrast, implicit reference group-wise (IRG) registration estimates correspondences between a group of images by jointly registering the images to an implicit reference corresponding to the group average. The implicit reference is estimated during IRG registration eliminating the bias associated with selecting a specific reference image. Registration performance was evaluated using segmented T1-weighted magnetic resonance images from the Nonrigid Image Registration Evaluation Project (NIREP), DTI and fMRI images. Implicit reference pair-wise (IRP) registration-a special case of IRG registration for two images-is shown to produce better relative overlap than IRG for pair-wise registration using the same small deformation, linear elastic registration model. However, IRP-G2R registration is shown to have significant transitivity error, i.e., significant inconsistencies between correspondences defined by different pair-wise transformations. In contrast, IRG registration produces consistent correspondence between images in a group at the cost of slightly reduced pair-wise RO accuracy compared to IRP-G2R. IRG spatial normalization of the fractional anisotropy (FA) maps of DTI is shown to have smaller FA variance compared with G2R methods using the same elastic registration model. Analyses of fMRI data sets with sensorimotor and visual tasks show that IRG registration, on average, increases the statistical detectability of brain activation compared to G2R registration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19371788      PMCID: PMC2719682          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  27 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images.

Authors:  M Jenkinson; S Smith
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration.

Authors:  Daniel Rueckert; Alejandro F Frangi; Julia A Schnabel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation.

Authors:  Brian Avants; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A unified information-theoretic approach to groupwise non-rigid registration and model building.

Authors:  Carole J Twining; Tim Cootes; Stephen Marsland; Vladimir Petrovic; Roy Schestowitz; Chris J Taylor
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2005

7.  Symmetric data attachment terms for large deformation image registration.

Authors:  Mirza Faisal Beg; Ali Khan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI.

Authors:  P J Basser; C Pierpaoli
Journal:  J Magn Reson B       Date:  1996-06

9.  Unbiased diffeomorphic atlas construction for computational anatomy.

Authors:  S Joshi; Brad Davis; Matthieu Jomier; Guido Gerig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Validation of partial tissue segmentation of single-channel magnetic resonance images of the brain.

Authors:  T J Grabowski; R J Frank; N R Szumski; C K Brown; H Damasio
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  30 in total

1.  Intrinsic resting-state activity predicts working memory brain activation and behavioral performance.

Authors:  Qihong Zou; Thomas J Ross; Hong Gu; Xiujuan Geng; Xi-Nian Zuo; L Elliot Hong; Jia-Hong Gao; Elliot A Stein; Yu-Feng Zang; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  DRAMMS: Deformable registration via attribute matching and mutual-saliency weighting.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Aristeidis Sotiras; Nikos Paragios; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Learning task-optimal registration cost functions for localizing cytoarchitecture and function in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  B T Thomas Yeo; Mert R Sabuncu; Tom Vercauteren; Daphne J Holt; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles; Polina Golland; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Feature-based groupwise registration by hierarchical anatomical correspondence detection.

Authors:  Guorong Wu; Qian Wang; Hongjun Jia; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Salience and default mode network dysregulation in chronic cocaine users predict treatment outcome.

Authors:  Xiujuan Geng; Yuzheng Hu; Hong Gu; Betty Jo Salmeron; Bryon Adinoff; Elliot A Stein; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Mid-space-independent deformable image registration.

Authors:  Iman Aganj; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Martin Reuter; Mert Rory Sabuncu; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A resting state fMRI analysis pipeline for pooling inference across diverse cohorts: an ENIGMA rs-fMRI protocol.

Authors:  Bhim M Adhikari; Neda Jahanshad; Dinesh Shukla; Jessica Turner; Dominik Grotegerd; Udo Dannlowski; Harald Kugel; Jennifer Engelen; Bruno Dietsche; Axel Krug; Tilo Kircher; Els Fieremans; Jelle Veraart; Dmitry S Novikov; Premika S W Boedhoe; Ysbrand D van der Werf; Odile A van den Heuvel; Jonathan Ipser; Anne Uhlmann; Dan J Stein; Erin Dickie; Aristotle N Voineskos; Anil K Malhotra; Fabrizio Pizzagalli; Vince D Calhoun; Lea Waller; Ilja M Veer; Hernik Walter; Robert W Buchanan; David C Glahn; L Elliot Hong; Paul M Thompson; Peter Kochunov
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.978

8.  Anatomical differences and network characteristics underlying smoking cue reactivity.

Authors:  Xiaochu Zhang; Betty Jo Salmeron; Thomas J Ross; Hong Gu; Xiujuan Geng; Yihong Yang; Elliot A Stein
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Basal Hippocampal Activity and Its Functional Connectivity Predicts Cocaine Relapse.

Authors:  Bryon Adinoff; Hong Gu; Carmen Merrick; Meredith McHugh; Haekyung Jeon-Slaughter; Hanzhang Lu; Yihong Yang; Elliot A Stein
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Regional excitation-inhibition balance predicts default-mode network deactivation via functional connectivity.

Authors:  Hong Gu; Yuzheng Hu; Xi Chen; Yong He; Yihong Yang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.