Literature DB >> 19371495

An evaluation of the full level of response to alcohol model of heavy drinking and problems in COGA offspring.

Marc A Schuckit1, Tom L Smith, George P Danko, Ryan Trim, Kathleen K Bucholz, Howard J Edenberg, Victor Hesselbrock, John J Kramer, Danielle M Dick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The low level of response (LR) to alcohol is an endophenotype related to heavier drinking and alcohol problems. Structural equation models (SEMs) indicate LR affects alcohol outcomes (ALCOUT) both directly and through mediation by drinking in peers (PEER), alcohol expectancies (EXPECT), and drinking to cope with stress (COPE), with some variation depending on the sample tested. This article presents the first full test of this LR-based model in young subjects from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA).
METHOD: Data were generated from 325 12- to 22-year-old (47.4% male) drinking offspring from COGA families, using the Self-Report of the Effects of Alcohol questionnaire to determine LR early in the drinking career and a validated, structured interview for demography and alcohol use/problem patterns. Standardized questionnaires were used to measure PEER, EXPECT, and COPE, with the model tested through the maximum likelihood estimation for analyses of the variance/covariance matrix using both Amos and Mplus.
RESULTS: The SEM yielded good fit characteristics and explained 59% of the variance, with LR relating both directly to ALCOUT and as partially mediated by PEER and COPE. Although GENDER related to both LR and ALCOUT in the model, and AGE related to ALCOUT, the SEM results were invariant across both AGE and GENDER, with generally similar invariant results regarding the presence or absence of an alcohol-use disorder diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The results support the applicability of the LR-based model of heavy drinking and alcohol problems in the COGA offspring, a group with different demography compared with the two other samples of adolescents tested to date. The modest differences observed across samples will be evaluated in future research to enhance understanding of how the model operates across socioeconomic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19371495      PMCID: PMC2670749          DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs        ISSN: 1937-1888            Impact factor:   2.582


  40 in total

1.  Social and coping reasons for drinking: predicting alcohol misuse in adolescents.

Authors:  C M Bradizza; A Reifman; G M Barnes
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Testing the level of response to alcohol: social information processing model of alcoholism risk--a 20-year prospective study.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith; Kristen G Anderson; Sandra A Brown
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Drinking motives as mediators of the link between alcohol expectancies and alcohol use among adolescents.

Authors:  Emmanuel Kuntsche; Ronald Knibbe; Rutger Engels; Gerhard Gmel
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Searching for the full picture: structural equation modeling in alcohol research.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Michael Windle; Tom L Smith; Victor Hesselbrock; Christine Ohannessian; Susan Averna; Lance Bauer; John Kramer; Kathleen Bucholz; Kenneth J Sher
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  The Self-Rating of the Effects of alcohol (SRE) form as a retrospective measure of the risk for alcoholism.

Authors:  M A Schuckit; T L Smith; J E Tipp
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Alcohol use in early adolescence: the effect of changes in risk taking, perceived harm and friends' alcohol use.

Authors:  Kimberly L Henry; Michael D Slater; Eugene R Oetting
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-03

7.  Evaluation of a level of response to alcohol-based structural equation model in adolescents.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith; George P Danko; Kristen G Anderson; Sandra A Brown; Sam Kuperman; John Kramer; Victor Hesselbrock; Kathleen Bucholz
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-03

Review 8.  Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: a conceptual overview.

Authors:  R H Hoyle; G T Smith
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1994-06

9.  The level of response to alcohol in daughters of alcoholics and controls.

Authors:  Mimy Y Eng; Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report on the reliability of the SSAGA.

Authors:  K K Bucholz; R Cadoret; C R Cloninger; S H Dinwiddie; V M Hesselbrock; J I Nurnberger; T Reich; I Schmidt; M A Schuckit
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1994-03
View more
  35 in total

1.  Subjective and neural responses to intravenous alcohol in young adults with light and heavy drinking patterns.

Authors:  Jodi M Gilman; Vijay A Ramchandani; Tess Crouss; Daniel W Hommer
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Trajectories of alcohol consumption following liver transplantation.

Authors:  A DiMartini; M A Dew; N Day; M G Fitzgerald; B L Jones; M E deVera; P Fontes
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  The ontogeny of ethanol aversion.

Authors:  Jessica Saalfield; Linda Spear
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-01-13

4.  fMRI differences between subjects with low and high responses to alcohol during a stop signal task.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Susan Tapert; Scott C Matthews; Martin P Paulus; Neil J Tolentino; Tom L Smith; Ryan S Trim; Shana Hall; Alan Simmons
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Alcohol stress response dampening during imminent versus distal, uncertain threat.

Authors:  Kathryn R Hefner; Christine A Moberg; Laura Y Hachiya; John J Curtin
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-08

6.  Acute ethanol effects on brain activation in low- and high-level responders to alcohol.

Authors:  Ryan S Trim; Alan N Simmons; Neil J Tolentino; Shana A Hall; Scott C Matthews; Shannon K Robinson; Tom L Smith; Claudia B Padula; Martin P Paulus; Susan F Tapert; Marc A Schuckit
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Persistent high alcohol consumption in alcohol-preferring (P) rats results from a lack of normal aversion to alcohol.

Authors:  Amir H Rezvani; Hannah Sexton; Edward D Levin
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.826

8.  A Prospective Comparison of How the Level of Response to Alcohol and Impulsivity Relate to Future DSM-IV Alcohol Problems in the COGA Youth Panel.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith; George Danko; Robert Anthenelli; Lara Schoen; Mari Kawamura; John Kramer; Danielle M Dick; Zoe Neale; Samuel Kuperman; Vivia McCutcheon; Andrey P Anokhin; Victor Hesselbrock; Michie Hesselbrock; Kathleen Bucholz
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Relationships among independent major depressions, alcohol use, and other substance use and related problems over 30 years in 397 families.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith; Jelger Kalmijn
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Hypothetical evaluations of positive and negative alcohol consequences in adolescents across various levels of drinking experience.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Hector I Lopez-Vergara; Nancy P Barnett; Kristina M Jackson
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.