Literature DB >> 19370826

Multizone LASIK with peripheral near zone for correction of presbyopia in myopic and hyperopic eyes: 1-year results.

Alaa M El Danasoury1, Tamer O Gamaly, Mohamed Hantera.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the refractive outcomes of multifocal LASIK to create a center far, peripheral near zone in presbyopes.
METHODS: This prospective study using LASIK with a center far, peripheral near ablation algorithm comprised 68 eyes of 34 hyperopes and 78 eyes of 39 myopes. Mean patient age was 49 +/- 5.60 years for hyperopes and 46.0 +/- 3.80 years for myopes. Mean baseline manifest refraction spherical equivalent was +1.76 +/- 0.96 diopters (D) in hyperopes and -3.06 +/- 1.73 D in myopes. The mean baseline addition was +1.94 +/- 0.40 D in hyperopes and +1.67 +/- 0.44 D in myopes. One-year postoperative outcomes are reported.
RESULTS: The mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.10 +/- 0.55 D in hyperopes and -0.48 +/- 0.51 D in myopes. Two percent of eyes in each group lost two lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. With the distance correction in place, 20/40 or better near uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) (Sloan acuity) was achieved in 33% of hyperopes and 36% of myopes. A statistically significant difference was noted in postoperative near visual acuity measured by the Sloan and Rosenbaum charts (P < .05). Fifty-four percent of hyperopes and 48% of myopes were satisfied or very satisfied with their postoperative near UCVA.
CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal LASIK to create a center far and peripheral near zone is safe and allows half of the patients to achieve spectacle independence. A peripheral near zone was only created in myopic treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19370826     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090301-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of visual effects of FS-LASIK for myopia centered on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex or the line of sight.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Shi-Sheng Zhang; Qin Yu; Jing-Cai Lian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Conductive keratoplasty for the treatment of presbyopia: comparative study between post- and non-LASIK eyes.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; Miyuki Watabe; Mitsutoshi Ito; Tadahiko Tsuru
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-16

Review 3.  Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review.

Authors:  Veronica Vargas-Fragoso; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-04-13

4.  Successful Restoration of Visual Acuity with an Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens after Multifocal Laser Ablation.

Authors:  Sondra Black
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-11

Review 5.  Review of Static Approaches to Surgical Correction of Presbyopia.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Zare Mehrjerdi; Masomeh Mohebbi; Mehdi Zandian
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

6.  A preliminary study on the visual outcomes after LaserACE for presbyopia.

Authors:  Ye Xu; Meiyan Li; Peijun Yao; Ruoyan Wei; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

Review 7.  Current management of presbyopia.

Authors:  Pandelis A Papadopoulos; Alexandros P Papadopoulos
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.

Authors:  Marie Joan Therese D Balgos; Veronica Vargas; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

9.  Corneal Stromal Filler Injection as a Novel Approach to Correct Presbyopia-An Ex Vivo Pilot Study.

Authors:  Stefan Kassumeh; Jannik K Luther; Christian M Wertheimer; Katharina Brandt; Merle S Schenk; Siegfried G Priglinger; Andreas Wartak; Gabriela Apiou-Sbirlea; R Rox Anderson; Reginald Birngruber
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.