Literature DB >> 19369359

Conceptual binding: integrated visual cues reduce processing costs in bimanual movements.

N Wenderoth1, M Van Dooren, A Vandebroek, J De Vos, S Vangheluwe, C M Stinear, W D Byblow, S P Swinnen.   

Abstract

In discrete reaction time (RT) tasks, it has been shown that nonsymmetric bimanual movements are initiated slower than symmetric movements in response to symbolic cues. By contrast, no such RT differences are found in response to direct cues ("direct cue effect"). Here, we report three experiments showing that the direct cue effect generalizes to rhythmical bimanual movements and that RT cost depends on different cue features: 1) symbolic versus direct or 2) integrated (i.e., action of both hands is indicated as one entity) versus dissociated (i.e., action of each hand is indicated separately). Our main finding was that dissociated symbolic cues were most likely processed serially, resulting in the longest RTs, which were substantially reduced with integrated symbolic cues. However, extra RT costs for switching to nonsymmetrical bimanual movements were overcome only when the integrated cues were direct. We conclude that computational resources might have been exceeded when the response needs to be determined for each hand separately, but not when a common response for both hands is selected. This supports the idea that bimanual control benefits from conceptual binding.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19369359     DOI: 10.1152/jn.91090.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  7 in total

1.  Bimanual coordination affects motor task switching.

Authors:  Brandon J Bernardin; Andrea H Mason
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Disturbed cortico-subcortical interactions during motor task switching in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Inge Leunissen; James P Coxon; Monique Geurts; Karen Caeyenberghs; Karla Michiels; Stefan Sunaert; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Stopping Interference in Response Inhibition: Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Selective Stopping.

Authors:  Corey G Wadsley; John Cirillo; Arne Nieuwenhuys; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Testing multiple coordination constraints with a novel bimanual visuomotor task.

Authors:  Helene M Sisti; Monique Geurts; René Clerckx; Jolien Gooijers; James P Coxon; Marcus H Heitger; Karen Caeyenberghs; Iseult A M Beets; Leen Serbruyns; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  An Activation Threshold Model for Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Hayley J MacDonald; Angus J C McMorland; Cathy M Stinear; James P Coxon; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Difference of Neural Networks between Bimanual Antiphase and In-Phase Upper Limb Movements: A Preliminary Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Qiang Lin; Hai Li; Yu-Rong Mao; Wai-Leung Lo; Jiang-Li Zhao; Ling Chen; Yan Leng; Dong-Feng Huang; Le Li
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.