Literature DB >> 19369288

Dicentric chromosomes and gamma-H2AX foci formation in lymphocytes of human blood samples exposed to a CT scanner: a direct comparison of dose response relationships.

Sven Golfier1, Gregor Jost, Hubertus Pietsch, Philipp Lengsfeld, Friederike Eckardt-Schupp, Ernst Schmid, Matthias Voth.   

Abstract

Experiments using the induction of dicentric chromosomes (dicentrics) as well as the gamma-H2AX foci formation in lymphocytes of blood samples from a healthy donor were performed to directly evaluate the radiation sensitivity of both biological endpoints. For computed tomography scans at dose levels from 0.025 to 1 Gy, a linear-quadratic dose-response relationship for dicentrics and a linear dose-response relationship for gamma-H2AX foci were obtained. The coefficients of the dose-response relationship for dicentrics are alpha = (3.76 +/- 0.29) x 10(-2) Gy(-1) and beta = (5.54 +/- 0.45) x 10(-2) Gy(-2), the linear coefficient for gamma-H2AX foci is (7.38 +/- 0.11) Gy(-1). The findings indicate that scoring of dicentrics as well as microscopic analysis of gamma-H2AX foci are sensitive methods to quantify a radiation-induced biological damage at low doses. However, since gamma-H2AX foci can be partially repaired within a few hours, biological damages present for days or even months, which constitute the clinically relevant endpoints, can only be quantified reliably by scoring of chromosome aberrations. Thus currently the quantification of dicentrics or reciprocal translocations remains the recommended method for estimating the effect of exposures to low dose levels of radiation ('biological dosimetry'). However, owing to the high radiation sensitivity of the gamma-H2AX foci assay observed in the present study, further investigations on the effectiveness of low-linear energy transfer radiation qualities in producing gamma-H2AX foci in lymphocytes from healthy donors should be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19369288     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncp061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  21 in total

1.  Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Arif N Ali; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Victoria A Satinsky; Steven G Swarts; Benjamin B Williams; Eugene Demidenko; Wilson Schreiber; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.316

2.  A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Dosimetric Methods to Triage a Large Population Following a Radiological Event.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Roberto J Nicolalde; Eugene Demidenko; Benjamin B Williams; Alla Shapiro; Albert L Wiley; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Meas       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Advances in a framework to compare bio-dosimetry methods for triage in large-scale radiation events.

Authors:  Ann Barry Flood; Holly K Boyle; Gaixin Du; Eugene Demidenko; Roberto J Nicolalde; Benjamin B Williams; Harold M Swartz
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 4.  DNA damage-associated biomarkers in studying individual sensitivity to low-dose radiation from cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Patricia K Nguyen; Dominik Fleischmann; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Flow cytometry-assisted quantification of γH2AX expression has potential as a rapid high-throughput biodosimetry tool.

Authors:  Daniel G Achel; Antonio M Serafin; John M Akudugu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Radiation damage and radioprotectants: new concepts in the era of molecular medicine.

Authors:  M I Koukourakis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  RPB5-mediating protein is required for the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Huicui Yang; Junxia Gu; Qiping Zheng; Min Li; Xiaoning Lian; Jingcheng Miao; Jingting Jiang; Wenxiang Wei
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Use of the γ-H2AX assay to monitor DNA damage and repair in translational cancer research.

Authors:  Alesia Ivashkevich; Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Roger F Martin; Olga A Martin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks in blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations.

Authors:  Matthias S May; Michael Brand; Wolfgang Wuest; Katharina Anders; Torsten Kuwert; Olaf Prante; Daniela Schmidt; Simone Maschauer; Richard C Semelka; Michael Uder; Michael A Kuefner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Comet assay: a versatile but complex tool in genotoxicity testing.

Authors:  Eugenia Cordelli; Margherita Bignami; Francesca Pacchierotti
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.