Literature DB >> 19369260

Reward quality influences the development of learned olfactory biases in honeybees.

Geraldine A Wright1, Amir F Choudhary, Michael A Bentley.   

Abstract

Plants produce flowers with complex visual and olfactory signals, but we know relatively little about the way that signals such as floral scents have evolved. One important factor that may direct the evolution of floral signals is a pollinator's ability to learn. When animals learn to associate two similar signals with different outcomes, biases in their responses to new signals can be formed. Here, we investigated whether or not pollinators develop learned biases towards floral scents that depend on nectar reward quality by training restrained honeybees to learn to associate two similar odour signals with different outcomes using a classical conditioning assay. Honeybees developed learned biases towards odours as a result of differential conditioning, and the extent to which an olfactory bias could be produced depended upon the difference in the quality of the nectar rewards experienced during conditioning. Our results suggest that differences in reward quality offered by flowers influence odour recognition by pollinators, which in turn could influence the evolution of floral scents in natural populations of co-flowering plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19369260      PMCID: PMC2686651          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  34 in total

1.  The geometry of stimulus control.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  A novel role for proline in plant floral nectars.

Authors:  Clay Carter; Sharoni Shafir; Lia Yehonatan; Reid G Palmer; Robert Thornburg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-02-08

Review 3.  Biases in signal evolution: learning makes a difference.

Authors:  Carel ten Cate; Candy Rowe
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Stimulus generalization: some predictions from a model of Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1976-01

Review 5.  The complexity of nectar: secretion and resorption dynamically regulate nectar features.

Authors:  Massimo Nepi; Małgorzata Stpiczyńska
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-10-06

6.  The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.).

Authors:  R E Page; J Erber; M K Fondrk
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Odour concentration affects odour identity in honeybees.

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Mitchell G A Thomson; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Different thresholds for detection and discrimination of odors in the honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Perceptual accuracy and conflicting effects of certainty on risk-taking behaviour.

Authors:  Sharoni Shafir; Taly Reich; Erez Tsur; Ido Erev; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Variability in floral scent in rewarding and deceptive orchids: the signature of pollinator-imposed selection?

Authors:  Charlotte C Salzmann; Antonio M Nardella; Salvatore Cozzolino; Florian P Schiestl
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.357

View more
  21 in total

1.  Flowers help bees cope with uncertainty: signal detection and the function of floral complexity.

Authors:  Anne S Leonard; Anna Dornhaus; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Looking forward to another successful year.

Authors:  Michael Hassell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Chronic neonicotinoid pesticide exposure and parasite stress differentially affects learning in honeybees and bumblebees.

Authors:  Saija Piiroinen; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Neuroscience: Intelligence in the Honeybee Mushroom Body.

Authors:  Sophie Caron; Larry F Abbott
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Associative conditioning tunes transient dynamics of early olfactory processing.

Authors:  Patricia C Fernandez; Fernando F Locatelli; Nicole Person-Rennell; Gregory Deleo; Brian H Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Exposure to multiple cholinergic pesticides impairs olfactory learning and memory in honeybees.

Authors:  Sally M Williamson; Geraldine A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Visual generalization in honeybees: evidence of peak shift in color discrimination.

Authors:  J Martínez-Harms; N Márquez; R Menzel; M Vorobyev
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  A sensory bias overrides learned preferences of bumblebees for honest signals in Mimulus guttatus.

Authors:  Ariela I Haber; James W Sims; Mark C Mescher; Consuelo M De Moraes; David E Carr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Reward value determines memory consolidation in parasitic wasps.

Authors:  H Marjolein Kruidhof; Foteini G Pashalidou; Nina E Fatouros; Ilich A Figueroa; Louise E M Vet; Hans M Smid; Martinus E Huigens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Changes in floral bouquets from compound-specific responses to increasing temperatures.

Authors:  Gerard Farré-Armengol; Iolanda Filella; Joan Llusià; Ulo Niinemets; Josep Peñuelas
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 10.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.