Literature DB >> 19369112

Does chromatin remodeling mark systemic acquired resistance?

Harrold A van den Burg1, Frank L W Takken.   

Abstract

The recognition of plant pathogens activates local defense responses and triggers a long-lasting systemic acquired resistance (SAR) response. Activation of SAR requires the hormone salicylic acid (SA), which induces SA-responsive gene expression. Recent data link changes in gene expression to chromatin remodeling, such as histone modifications and histone replacement. Here, we propose a model in which recruitment of chromatin-modifying complexes to SA-responsive loci controls their basal and SA-induced expression. Basal repression of these loci requires the post-translational modifier SUMO (SMALL UBIQUITIN-LIKE MODIFIER). This is of particular relevance because SUMO conjugation has been shown to control the activity, assembly and disassembly of chromatin-modifying complexes to transcription complexes. Chromatin remodeling could be instrumental for priming of SA-responsive loci to enable their enhanced reactivation upon subsequent pathogen attack.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19369112     DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Plant Sci        ISSN: 1360-1385            Impact factor:   18.313


  30 in total

1.  Next-generation systemic acquired resistance.

Authors:  Estrella Luna; Toby J A Bruce; Michael R Roberts; Victor Flors; Jurriaan Ton
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Multiple exposures to drought 'train' transcriptional responses in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Yong Ding; Michael Fromm; Zoya Avramova
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  Dual-function transcription factors and their entourage: unique and unifying themes governing two pathogenesis-related genes.

Authors:  Patrick Boyle; Charles Després
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-06-01

4.  Chromatin modification acts as a memory for systemic acquired resistance in the plant stress response.

Authors:  Michal Jaskiewicz; Uwe Conrath; Christoph Peterhänsel
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  SUMO-, MAPK-, and resistance protein-signaling converge at transcription complexes that regulate plant innate immunity.

Authors:  Harrold A van den Burg; Frank L W Takken
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-12-01

6.  The Arabidopsis chromatin modifier ATX1, the myotubularin-like AtMTM and the response to drought.

Authors:  Yong Ding; Hanna Lapko; Ivan Ndamukong; Yuannan Xia; Ayed Al-Abdallat; Sreedevi Lalithambika; Monther Sadder; Abdelaty Saleh; Michael Fromm; Jean-Jack Riethoven; Guoqing Lu; Zoya Avramova
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-11-15

7.  BRHIS1 suppresses rice innate immunity through binding to monoubiquitinated H2A and H2B variants.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Li; Yanxiang Jiang; Zhicheng Ji; Yaoguang Liu; Qunyu Zhang
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 8.  SUMO, a heavyweight player in plant abiotic stress responses.

Authors:  Pedro Humberto Castro; Rui Manuel Tavares; Eduardo R Bejarano; Herlânder Azevedo
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Arabidopsis small ubiquitin-like modifier paralogs have distinct functions in development and defense.

Authors:  Harrold A van den Burg; Ramachandra K Kini; Robert C Schuurink; Frank L W Takken
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 10.  Adaptation in the innate immune system and heterologous innate immunity.

Authors:  Stefan F Martin
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.