BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of our work was to evaluate in obese patients with an indication of replacement surgery for degenerative osteoarthritis, the utility of a hypocaloric diet with Optisource vs nutritional counseling. MATERIAL AND METHOD:Thirty six patients were randomized in both branches: diet I with lunch and dinner substituted by two Optisource (1109,3 kcal/day, 166,4g of carbohydrates (60%), 63g of proteins (23%), 21,3g of lipids 17%) and diet II with nutritional counselling with a decrease of 500 cal/day from the previous dietary intake. Before and 3 months after treatment, a nutritional and biochemical study was performed. RESULTS:Nineteen patients were randomized in group I and 17 patients in group II. 19 patients finished the study in group I and 14 in group II. Weight loss was higher in group I than II (7,7 [4,7] vs 3,92 [3,32] kg; P=.05), with a significant decrease of HOMA and diastolic blood pressure in group I. Decreases of body mass index (-2,9 [1,8] vs -1,4 [0,9]; P=.05), fat mass (-3,8 [3,4] vs -2,3 [1,7] kg; P=.0,05) and HOMA (-2,0 [2,2] vs -0,4 [1,82]; P=.05) were higher in group I than II. CONCLUSIONS:Obese patients with chronic osteoarthritis treated with a mixed diet supplemented with a commercial hypocaloric formula improved weight, fat mass and HOMA in a better way than patients treated with a dietary counselling alone.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of our work was to evaluate in obesepatients with an indication of replacement surgery for degenerative osteoarthritis, the utility of a hypocaloric diet with Optisource vs nutritional counseling. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Thirty six patients were randomized in both branches: diet I with lunch and dinner substituted by two Optisource (1109,3 kcal/day, 166,4g of carbohydrates (60%), 63g of proteins (23%), 21,3g of lipids 17%) and diet II with nutritional counselling with a decrease of 500 cal/day from the previous dietary intake. Before and 3 months after treatment, a nutritional and biochemical study was performed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were randomized in group I and 17 patients in group II. 19 patients finished the study in group I and 14 in group II. Weight loss was higher in group I than II (7,7 [4,7] vs 3,92 [3,32] kg; P=.05), with a significant decrease of HOMA and diastolic blood pressure in group I. Decreases of body mass index (-2,9 [1,8] vs -1,4 [0,9]; P=.05), fat mass (-3,8 [3,4] vs -2,3 [1,7] kg; P=.0,05) and HOMA (-2,0 [2,2] vs -0,4 [1,82]; P=.05) were higher in group I than II. CONCLUSIONS:Obesepatients with chronic osteoarthritis treated with a mixed diet supplemented with a commercial hypocaloric formula improved weight, fat mass and HOMA in a better way than patients treated with a dietary counselling alone.
Authors: Juan José López-Gómez; Olatz Izaola-Jauregui; David Primo-Martín; Beatriz Torres-Torres; Emilia Gómez-Hoyos; Ana Ortolá-Buigues; Miguel A Martín-Ferrero; Daniel A De Luis-Román Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 5.717