Literature DB >> 19368917

Diagnosis of pelvic adhesions in patients with endometrioma: the role of transvaginal ultrasonography.

Stefano Guerriero1, Silvia Ajossa, Nicoletta Garau, Juan Luis Alcazar, Valerio Mais, Gian Benedetto Melis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the diagnostic value of transvaginal ultrasonography in the detection of pelvic adhesions in women suspected of having endometriomas at ultrasonography.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Academic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. PATIENT(S): One hundred thirteen women who underwent surgery for an endometrioma. INTERVENTION(S): All patients underwent transvaginal ultrasonography before surgery, and at ultrasonography the presence of fixation of the ovary to the uterus was considered characteristic of the presence of pelvic adhesions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT(S): The sensitivity and specificity of the fixation to the uterus of at least one ovary were respectively 89% (95% CI 84%-92%) and 90% (95% CI 76%-97%). The likelihood ratio for fixation of at least one ovary to the uterus was 8.92 (95% CI 3.04-26) and for a "normal" ultrasound examination 0.12 (95% CI 0.06-0.23). The pretest probability of pelvic adhesions was 74%, and this probability increased to 96% when fixation of at least one ovary to the uterus was present and fell to 27% when this ultrasonographic finding was absent. CONCLUSION(S): Transvaginal ultrasonography seems to be able to detect or exclude the presence of adhesions in women with ultrasonographic suspicion of endometrioma. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19368917     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic confidence analysis in the magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian and deep endometriosis: comparison with surgical results.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Rosa Sulcis; Gian Benedetto Melis; Giannina Ibba; Juan Luis Alcazar; Mario Piga; Stefano Guerriero
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

3.  A higher prevalence of endometriosis among Asian women does not contribute to poorer IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Ayae Yamamoto; Erica B Johnstone; Michael S Bloom; Heather G Huddleston; Victor Y Fujimoto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Indirect and atypical imaging signals of endometriosis: A wide range of manifestations.

Authors:  A Vigueras Smith; R Cabrera; C Trippia; M Tessman Zomer; W Kondo; H Ferreira; L Carttaxo Da Silva; R Sumak
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-12

5.  Ultrasound mapping of pelvic endometriosis: does the location and number of lesions affect the diagnostic accuracy? A multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Tom K Holland; Alfred Cutner; Ertan Saridogan; Dimitrios Mavrelos; Kate Pateman; Davor Jurkovic
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.