Literature DB >> 19368778

Common attitudes about concomitant vaccine injections for infants and adolescents in Flanders, Belgium.

Heidi Theeten1, Niel Hens, Marc Aerts, Corinne Vandermeulen, Mathieu Roelants, Karel Hoppenbrouwers, Pierre Van Damme, Philippe Beutels.   

Abstract

Quantitative information on parents' preferences regarding multiple vaccine injections and on work-loss due to vaccination is important to guide decision making on the use of combination vaccines for universal vaccination. Our survey in families of 1347 toddlers (18 -- 24 months) and 1315 adolescents residing in Flanders, Belgium, revealed common attitudes in both age groups. The majority of parents would allow maximum two injections in one visit. 39% were not willing to pay anything to avoid a concomitant injection, whereas the remainder mentioned amounts around a median of c.20. The responses were hardly influenced by the socioeconomic determinants studied and the concordance between the number of concomitant injections parents would allow and their willingness-to-pay assessed by an open-ended question was limited, which suggests that more sensitive quantification using other methods would be useful. Work-loss due to vaccination was assessed for infants only and was rare (4.5%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19368778     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  5 in total

1.  Methods for addressing "innocent bystanders" when evaluating safety of concomitant vaccines.

Authors:  Shirley V Wang; Abdurrahman Abdurrob; Julia Spoendlin; Edwin Lewis; Sophia R Newcomer; Bruce Fireman; Matthew F Daley; Jason M Glanz; Jonathan Duffy; Eric S Weintraub; Martin Kulldorff
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Health care providers' and parents' attitudes toward administration of new infant vaccines--a multinational survey.

Authors:  P Bakhache; C Rodrigo; S Davie; A Ahuja; B Sudovar; T Crudup; M Rose
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  A novel approach to evaluating the UK childhood immunisation schedule: estimating the effective coverage vector across the entire vaccine programme.

Authors:  Sonya Crowe; Martin Utley; Guy Walker; Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths; Peter Grove; Christina Pagel
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Parents' attitude toward multiple vaccinations at a single visit with alternative delivery methods.

Authors:  Patricia Kaaijk; Deborah E Kleijne; Mirjam J Knol; Irene A Harmsen; Olga J A E Ophorst; Nynke Y Rots
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Hidden efficiencies: making completion of the pediatric vaccine schedule more efficient for physicians.

Authors:  Mike Ciarametaro; Steven E Bradshaw; Jillian Guiglotto; Beth Hahn; Genevieve Meier
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.