Literature DB >> 19367902

Synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering studies of the structure of porcine pepsin under various pH conditions.

Kyeong Sik Jin1, Yecheol Rho, Jehan Kim, Heesoo Kim, Ik Jung Kim, Moonhor Ree.   

Abstract

Structural characteristics of various conformational states of porcine pepsin in solution under different pH conditions were investigated in terms of size and shape by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). Low-resolution structural models of porcine pepsin were reconstructed from SAXS data, which were made inside the search volume of maximum dimension (Dmax), calculated from the pair distance distribution function p(r). The reconstructed structural models were obtained without imposing any restrictions on the symmetry or anisometry of the pepsin molecule. Under conditions emulating those for physiological activity of the enzyme, the reconstructed structural models exhibited a more extended C-terminal domain compared to the crystal structure. The differences between the solution and crystal structures of pepsin can be explained by inherent conformations of the flexible subdomain in the C-terminal domain under the solution pH conditions. Under mild acidic conditions where the enzyme is inactive, the reconstructed structural models revealed a compact globular conformation similar in overall shape to the crystal structure. These results indicate that the changes in fluorescence and circular dichroism curves observed under acidic conditions could also arise from the inherent conformation of the flexible subdomain, which has a tendency to roll into a sphere in the overall structure, but without affecting the stability of internal structure. Furthermore, the conformational changes in the subdomain might explain the inactivity of pepsin under mildly acidic conditions. Finally, compared to neutral denaturing conditions, pepsin under alkaline denaturing conditions had a larger expanded vertical conformation in the reconstructed model, as a consequence of alkaline denaturation of the N-terminal domain and a fully extended conformation of the C-terminal domain. The structural evidence presented here may have important implications for understanding the relationship between the structure of porcine pepsin and enzymatic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19367902     DOI: 10.1021/jp805940d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  7 in total

1.  Multi-spectroscopic studies on the interaction between traditional Chinese herb, helicid with pepsin.

Authors:  Manjunath D Meti; Yang Xu; Jiangfeng Xie; Yutao Chen; Zhibing Wu; Johnson Liu; Qingguo Han; Zhendan He; Zhangli Hu; Hong Xu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Accessing the reproducibility and specificity of pepsin and other aspartic proteases.

Authors:  Joomi Ahn; Min-Jie Cao; Ying Qing Yu; John R Engen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-10-10

3.  Probing the binding mechanisms of α-tocopherol to trypsin and pepsin using isothermal titration calorimetry, spectroscopic, and molecular modeling methods.

Authors:  Xiangrong Li; Tianjun Ni
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 1.365

4.  Binding of glutathione and melatonin to pepsin occurs via different binding mechanisms.

Authors:  Xiangrong Li; Tianjun Ni
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Dataset concerning GroEL chaperonin interaction with proteins.

Authors:  V V Marchenkov; N Yu Marchenko; A L Kaysheva; N V Kotova; I A Kashparov; G V Semisotnov
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2016-01-13

6.  Engineering the residual side chains of HAP phytases to improve their pepsin resistance and catalytic efficiency.

Authors:  Canfang Niu; Peilong Yang; Huiying Luo; Huoqing Huang; Yaru Wang; Bin Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Modification of Enzyme Activity by Vibrational Strong Coupling of Water.

Authors:  Robrecht M A Vergauwe; Anoop Thomas; Kalaivanan Nagarajan; Atef Shalabney; Jino George; Thibault Chervy; Marcus Seidel; Eloïse Devaux; Vladimir Torbeev; Thomas W Ebbesen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 15.336

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.