Literature DB >> 1936768

Use of water or air as oral contrast media for computed tomographic study of the gastric wall: comparison of the two techniques.

K J Gossios1, E V Tsianos, L L Demou, C K Tatsis, V P Papakostas, C N Masalas, M C Merkouropoulos, D S Kontogiannis.   

Abstract

Thirty-four patients with a high suspicion of gastric lesion at endoscopy were studied by two computed tomographic (CT) techniques: one using a gas-producing agent and the other using water as an oral contrast media. Intravenous contrast medium was also given in all patients who underwent the water technique. Final histologic proof was obtained either by endoscopy or at surgery. Both CT techniques detected the wall abnormality in 32 of the 34 patients, and both techniques missed the same lesion in two patients. The water technique showed more gastric wall details and the lesion's limits could be defined more accurately. The acceptance and tolerance of the gas-producing agent was better in severely ill patients than tap water.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1936768     DOI: 10.1007/bf01887371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  9 in total

1.  Computed tomography of the stomach with water as an oral contrast agent: technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  A L Baert; L Roex; G Marchal; P Hermans; D Dewilde; G Wilms
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  CT demonstration of normal gastric wall thickness: the value of administering gas-producing and paralytic agents.

Authors:  A H Karantanas; E B Tsianos; D S Kontogiannis; I C Pappas; P A Katsiotis
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Use of water as an oral contrast agent for CT study of the stomach.

Authors:  G Angelelli; L Macarini; A Fratello
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  CT of gastric masses: image patterns and a note on potential pitfalls.

Authors:  G Pillari; J Weinreb; F Vernace; S Kumari; J A Marc; G Phillips; V Cruz; R Pochaczevsky
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1983

5.  Normal or benign gastric wall thickening demonstrated by computed tomography.

Authors:  S Komaki
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Computed tomography of gastric neoplasms.

Authors:  D M Balfe; R E Koehler; N Karstaedt; R J Stanley; S S Sagel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Fat-density oral contrast agent for abdominal CT.

Authors:  V Raptopoulos; M A Davis; A Davidoff; A Karellas; D Hays; C J D'Orsi; E H Smith
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  CT's capability in detecting advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  S Komaki; S Toyoshima
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1983

9.  Evaluating the costs and benefits of a diagnostic technology: the case of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  J A Showstack; S A Schroeder; H R Steinberg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.983

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  MDCT appearance of the appendix: how does the low-density barium sulfate oral contrast agent affect it?

Authors:  Vahid Yaghmai; Anahita Aghaei-Lasboo; Warren M Brandwein; Sandra Tochetto; John N Mafi; Frank H Miller; Paul Nikolaidis
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2010-08-04

Review 2.  Using computed tomography scans to develop an ex-vivo gastric model.

Authors:  Jerome A Henry; Gerard O'Sullivan; Abhay S Pandit
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography: the future of small bowel imaging.

Authors:  Mark E Baker; David M Einstein; Joseph C Veniero
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

4.  Description of early gastric cancer with wall-carving technique on multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Satoshi Kawanami; Masahiro Komori; Daisuke Tsurumaru; Shuji Matsuura; Akihiro Nishie; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Evaluation of different small bowel contrast agents by multi - detector row CT.

Authors:  Yong-Ren Wang; Xiao-Li Yu; Zhi-Yi Peng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 6.  State-of-the-art preoperative staging of gastric cancer by MDCT and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Joon-Il Choi; Ijin Joo; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Determination of the relationship between gastric wall thickness and body mass index with endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Michael C Larsen; Brian M Yan; John Morton; Jacques Van Dam
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Comparison of neutral oral contrast versus positive oral contrast medium in abdominal multidetector CT.

Authors:  Ralph Berther; Michael A Patak; Boris Eckhardt; Sukru M Erturk; Christoph L Zollikofer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Significance of Gastric Wall Thickening Detected in Abdominal CT Scan to Predict Gastric Malignancy.

Authors:  A Akbas; H Bakir; M F Dasiran; H Dagmura; Z Ozmen; N Yildiz Celtek; E Daldal; O Demir; A Kefeli; I Okan
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.375

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.