| Literature DB >> 19367029 |
Keizo Nishiyama1, Takayoshi Tsutamoto, Toshinari Tanaka, Masanori Fujii, Takashi Yamamoto, Masayuki Yamaji, Minoru Horie.
Abstract
Because both atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) competitively bind to natriuretic peptide receptors but not N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP), the diagnostic value of BNP as a marker of the severity of heart failure in comparison with NT-proBNP during exogenous ANP (carperitide) infusion remains unclear. Forty-two patients with CHF (NYHA class III or IV) treated with the infusion of carperitide were included in the present study. We measured plasma levels of BNP and NT-proBNP at baseline and after the improvement of symptoms. We also measured these parameters before and 1 hour after stopping the infusion of carperitide. After stopping the infusion of carperitide, the plasma BNP level was significantly decreased by about 20% (394 +/- 53.8 versus 312.8 +/- 46 pg/mL, P < 0.0001) but plasma NT-proBNP did not change (1674.5 +/- 282.1 versus 1777.5 +/- 300.3 pg/mL, P = 0.259). The molar ratio of plasma BNP/NT-proBNP was significantly higher during carperitide infusion (0.74 +/- 0.08) than those at baseline (0.63 +/- 0.06) and after stopping carperitide (0.59 +/- 0.07). During carperitide infusion, plasma NT-proBNP may be a more reliable marker of endogenous cardiac natriuretic peptides than plasmaBNP, which may be increased by carperitide infusion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19367029 DOI: 10.1536/ihj.50.183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Heart J ISSN: 1349-2365 Impact factor: 1.862