Literature DB >> 1936690

Report from the International Pancreas Transplant Registry.

D E Sutherland1.   

Abstract

From December, 1966 through 1990, 3082 pancreas transplants were reported to the International Registry. A detailed analysis was performed on the 2087 transplants in the 1986-90 data base; during this time the overall one year recipient and graft functional survival rates were 89% and 62%. Univariate analyses showed graft survival rates to be significantly higher with bladder drainage than with other duct management techniques, with a simultaneous kidney transplant than without, and with preservation in UW than other solutions. Storage up to 30 hours did not adversely effect results. Graft survival rates were significantly higher in North America than Europe, a discrepancy that persisted in a Cox proportional hazard analysis that also included duct management, recipient category, HLA-DR mismatching, immunosuppression with anti-T cell agents, preservation solution and duration, and year of transplant as the other variables; three were identified to have a significant (p less than 0.05) impact on the relative risk (RR) of graft loss: 1) Recipient category, with an RR of 0.43 when placed simultaneously with a kidney; 2) Year, with an RR of 0.76 for transplants performed in 1989-90 versus 1986-88; and 3) Location, with an RR of 0.75 for transplants in North America versus Europe. The technical failure rate was significantly lower in North America than Europe, but this was not an explanation for the differences in outcome, since the same factors sorted out as significant in a Cox proportional hazard analysis of technically successful cases only. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis showed retransplantation, duct management, recipient category, preservation solution, and storage time to significantly influence the technical failure rate. The risk of technical failure was lowest for primary, bladder-drained, simultaneous pancreas/kidney, less than 12 hour UW stored grafts; year and location of transplant were not significant factors. Pancreas transplant results continue to improve and are in the range of those for other solid organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1936690     DOI: 10.1007/bf00587615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  5 in total

1.  A GENERALIZED WILCOXON TEST FOR COMPARING ARBITRARILY SINGLY-CENSORED SAMPLES.

Authors:  E A GEHAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Is HLA matching relevant in pancreas transplantation? A registry analysis.

Authors:  J P Squifflet; K Moudry; D E Sutherland
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.782

3.  Estimating odds ratios with categorically scaled covariates in multiple logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Prognostic risk factors for graft failure following pancreas transplantation: results of multivariate analysis of data from the International Pancreas Transplant Registry.

Authors:  A Viste; K Moudry-Munns; D E Sutherland
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.782

5.  Pancreas transplantation: report from the International Registry and a preliminary analysis of United States results from the New United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry.

Authors:  D E Sutherland; K C Moudry-Munns; K Gillingham
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1989
  5 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic transplantation: why, when and who?

Authors:  P J Lefèbvre
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 2.  Pancreas transplantation: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  D E Sutherland
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 3.  The efficacy of aldose reductase inhibitors in the management of diabetic complications. Comparison with intensive insulin treatment and pancreatic transplantation.

Authors:  J M van Gerven; A M Tjon-A-Tsien
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Conversion of exocrine secretions from bladder to enteric drainage in recipients of whole pancreaticoduodenal transplants.

Authors:  E Stephanian; R W Gruessner; K L Brayman; P Gores; D L Dunn; J S Najarian; D E Sutherland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Heterotopic autotransplantation of a pancreas segment with enteric drainage after total or subtotal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  K Tamura; S Yano; S Kin; H Nagami; M Itakura; M Nakagawa; A Nakase; R Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1993-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.