Literature DB >> 19365610

Testing differences in methods of preparing moss samples. Effect of washing on Pseudoscleropodium purum.

J A Fernández1, J R Aboal, A Carballeira.   

Abstract

When terrestrial mosses are used to study the risks associated with the accumulation of airborne pollutants, samples must be washed to remove deposits adhering to the surface. Here, we studied the effects of washing the samples as well as of freezing, drying, and acclimatization treatments. The differences between the concentrations of Al, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Ni, Pb, Se, V, and Zn in washed and unwashed samples were significant, and therefore, it would not be valid to combine or compare the data corresponding to samples treated thus. We also investigated whether there were significant differences in the concentrations of various metals and metalloids yielded from samples subjected to different treatments prior to washing (freezing, drying, acclimatization after drying, and acclimatization only), while also considering possible effects of the level and type of contamination and the weather conditions. For many of the elements, we found significant differences that depended on both the levels of contamination at each sampling site and the weather. As these differences may be due to changes in the contents of the different cellular fractions, the sequential elution technique was applied to determine the locations of Cu, K, and Zn. The freezing and drying procedures were rejected because they alter the permeability of the membranes and lead to underestimation of the concentrations of elements. With the acclimatization procedure, particles of some elements adhere to the surface, making this option unsuitable when a description of bioconcentration is required. Taking into account these limitations and the lack of an optimal procedure, acclimatization after drying is proposed as the best option for harmonizing the method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19365610     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-0867-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  6 in total

1.  An extended study of heavy metal deposition in Galicia (NW Spain) based on moss analysis.

Authors:  J A Fernández; A Rey; A Carballeira
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-05-24       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Definition and number of subsamples for using mosses as biomonitors of airborne trace elements.

Authors:  J R Aboal; J A Couto; J A Fernández; A Carballeira
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Testing differences in methods of preparing moss samples.

Authors:  J R Aboal; J A Fernández; J A Couto; A Carballeira
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Use of native and transplanted mosses as complementary techniques for biomonitoring mercury around an industrial facility.

Authors:  J A Fernández; J R Aboal; A Carballeira
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2000-07-10       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  A model for predicting ionic equilibrium concentrations in cell walls.

Authors:  H Sentenac; C Grignon
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, phenols, and trace metals in selected soil profiles and plant bioindicators in the Holy Cross Mountains, south-central Poland.

Authors:  Zdzisław M Migaszewski; Agnieszka Gałuszka; Piotr Pasławski
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.621

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Changes in the heavy metal and nutrient contents of dried feather mosses during long-term storage.

Authors:  Jarmo Poikolainen; Juha Piispanen; Jouni Karhu; Reijo Seppänen; Eero Kubin
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The influence of preparation methodology on the concentrations of heavy metals in Pleurozium schreberi moss samples prior to use in active biomonitoring studies.

Authors:  Paweł Świsłowski; Grzegorz Kosior; Małgorzata Rajfur
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 4.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.