Literature DB >> 19365254

Scoliosis surgery in cerebral palsy: differences between unit rod and custom rods.

Paul D Sponseller1, Suken A Shah, Mark F Abel, Daniel Sucato, Peter O Newton, Harry Shufflebarger, Lawrence G Lenke, Lynn Letko, Randal Betz, Michelle Marks, Tracey Bastrom.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in intraoperative factors and postoperative results between pediatric patients with cerebral palsy (CP) treated with unit rods and those treated with custom-bent rods. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No prior study has directly compared unit and custom-bent rods for CP.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and radiographic data of 157 children with CP who underwent posterior spinal fusion. Of those 157, we treated 79 with unit rods and 78 with custom-bent rods. Minimum follow-up was 2 years.
RESULTS: Intraoperatively, unit rod surgeries were associated with significantly shorter mean surgical time (339 and 379 minutes, respectively; P = 0.04), longer mean intensive care unit stay (4 vs. 3 days, respectively; P = 0.001), and longer mean hospital stay (14 vs. 13 days; P = 0.006) than custom-bent rod procedures. The mean estimated blood loss was higher for unit rods (2124 vs. 1885 mL, respectively), but not significantly so. After surgery, unit rod surgeries were associated with significantly more mean pelvic obliquity correction (74% vs. 22%, respectively; P = 0.002), more mean clinically apparent implant prominence at 2-year follow-up (12 vs. 2 instances; P = 0.03; most were proximal), and a higher mean infection rate (15% vs. 5%, respectively; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in final major Cobb correction, curves with an apex above or below T10, implant-related reoperations, or neurologic complications. The only factor that was statistically correlated with the overall complication rate for both groups was absolute curve magnitude (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Compared with custom-bent rods, unit rods provided superior correction of pelvic obliquity but were associated with higher transfusion requirements, higher infection rates, more proximal fixation problems, and longer intensive care unit and hospital stays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19365254     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819487b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Surgical site infection after pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Ying Li; Michael Glotzbecker; Daniel Hedequist
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-02-09

2.  Major perioperative complications after spine surgery in patients with cerebral palsy: assessment of risk factors.

Authors:  Amer F Samdani; Eric J Belin; James T Bennett; Firoz Miyanji; Joshua M Pahys; Suken A Shah; Peter O Newton; Randal R Betz; Patrick J Cahill; Paul D Sponseller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pelvic fixation for neuromuscular scoliosis deformity correction.

Authors:  Romain Dayer; Jean Albert Ouellet; Neil Saran
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-06

4.  Surgical correction of scoliosis in patients with severe cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Klaas Beckmann; Tobias Lange; Georg Gosheger; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Matthias Borowski; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Transition of Caregiver Perceptions after Pediatric Neuromuscular Scoliosis Surgery.

Authors:  Naoyuki Nakamura; Yuichiro Kawabe; Masatoshi Oba; Takako Momose; Jiro Machida; Yutaka Inaba
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-10

6.  Use of caudal epidural catheter in a child with cerebral palsy with prior posterior spine (T1-sacrum) fusion.

Authors:  Divya Dixit; Mary C Theroux; Kirk W Dabney; Freeman Miller
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.