Literature DB >> 19365011

Pegaptanib sodium for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

John J Wroblewski1, John A Wells, Anthony P Adamis, Ronald R Buggage, Emmett T Cunningham, Mauro Goldbaum, David R Guyer, Barrett Katz, Michael M Altaweel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of intravitreous pegaptanib sodium for the treatment of macular edema following central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
DESIGN: This dose-ranging, double-masked, multicenter, phase 2 trial included subjects with CRVO for 6 months' or less duration randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive pegaptanib sodium or sham injections every 6 weeks for 24 weeks (0.3 mg and 1 mg, n=33; sham, n=32). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Visual acuity at week 30.
RESULTS: In the primary analysis at week 30, 12 of 33 (36%) subjects treated with 0.3 mg of pegaptanib sodium and 13 of 33 (39%) treated with 1 mg gained 15 or more letters from baseline vs 9 of 32 (28%) sham-treated subjects (P= .48 for 0.3 mg and P= .35 for 1 mg of pegaptanib sodium vs sham). In secondary analyses, subjects treated with pegaptanib sodium were less likely to lose 15 or more letters (9% and 6%; 0.3-mg and 1-mg pegaptanib sodium groups, respectively) compared with sham-treated eyes (31%; P= .03 for 0.3 mg and P= .01 for 1 mg of pegaptanib sodium vs sham) and showed greater improvement in mean visual acuity (+7.1 and +9.9, respectively, vs -3.2 letters with sham; P= .09 for 0.3 mg and P= .02 for 1 mg of pegaptanib sodium vs sham). By week 1, the mean central retinal thickness decreased in the 0.3-mg and 1-mg pegaptanib sodium groups by 269 microm and 210 microm, respectively, vs 5 microm with sham (P< .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this 30-week study, intravitreous pegaptanib sodium appears to provide visual and anatomical benefits in the treatment of macular edema following CRVO. APPLICATION TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Benefits accrued with intravitreous pegaptanib sodium treatment of macular edema following CRVO suggest a role for vascular endothelial growth factor in the pathogenesis of this condition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00088283.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19365011     DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  21 in total

Review 1.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Tasanee Braithwaite; Afshan A Nanji; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab alone or with triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of macular edema caused by central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Wang; Xiao Li; Yus-Sheng Wang; Zi-Feng Zhang; Man-Hong Li; Xiao-Na Su; Jin-Ting Zhu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone with observation to treat vision loss associated with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) study report 5.

Authors:  Michael S Ip; Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Neal L Oden; Barbara A Blodi; Marian Fisher; Lawrence J Singerman; Michael Tolentino; Clement K Chan; Victor H Gonzalez
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09

4.  Intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of serous macular detachment in central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Adnan Cinal; Focke Ziemssen; Karl U Bartz-Schmidt; Faik Gelisken
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Extended field imaging using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Shinji Kakihara; Takao Hirano; Yasuhiro Iesato; Akira Imai; Yuichi Toriyama; Toshinori Murata
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Tasanee Braithwaite; Afshan A Nanji; Kristina Lindsley; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-05-01

7.  Economic considerations of macular edema therapies.

Authors:  William E Smiddy
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Comparison between ranibizumab and aflibercept for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Yoshitsugu Saishin; Yuka Ito; Masato Fujikawa; Tomoko Sawada; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  A prospective, randomised, multicenter trial for surgical treatment of central retinal vein occlusion: results of the Radial Optic Neurotomy for Central Vein Occlusion (ROVO) study group.

Authors:  Tina Aggermann; Simon Brunner; Ilse Krebs; Paulina Haas; Irene Womastek; Werner Brannath; Susanne Binder
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  PEGylation of bacterial cocaine esterase for protection against protease digestion and immunogenicity.

Authors:  Jun-Beom Park; Young Min Kwon; Tien-Yi Lee; Remy Brim; Mei-Chuan Ko; Roger K Sunahara; James H Woods; Victor C Yang
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.