Literature DB >> 19364845

Efficacy of daptomycin in implant-associated infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: importance of combination with rifampin.

Anne-Kathrin John1, Daniela Baldoni, Manuel Haschke, Katharina Rentsch, Patrick Schaerli, Werner Zimmerli, Andrej Trampuz.   

Abstract

Limited treatment options are available for implant-associated infections caused by methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We compared the activity of daptomycin (alone and with rifampin [rifampicin]) with the activities of other antimicrobial regimens against MRSA ATCC 43300 in the guinea pig foreign-body infection model. The daptomycin MIC and the minimum bactericidal concentration in logarithmic phase and stationary growth phase of MRSA were 0.625, 0.625, and 20 microg/ml, respectively. In time-kill studies, daptomycin showed rapid and concentration-dependent killing of MRSA in stationary growth phase. At concentrations above 20 microg/ml, daptomycin reduced the counts by >3 log(10) CFU/ml in 2 to 4 h. In sterile cage fluid, daptomycin peak concentrations of 23.1, 46.3, and 53.7 microg/ml were reached 4 to 6 h after the administration of single intraperitoneal doses of 20, 30, and 40 mg/kg of body weight, respectively. In treatment studies, daptomycin alone reduced the planktonic MRSA counts by 0.3 log(10) CFU/ml, whereas in combination with rifampin, a reduction in the counts of >6 log(10) CFU/ml was observed. Vancomycin and daptomycin (at both doses) were unable to cure any cage-associated infection when they were given as monotherapy, whereas rifampin alone cured the infections in 33% of the cages. In combination with rifampin, daptomycin showed cure rates of 25% (at 20 mg/kg) and 67% (at 30 mg/kg), vancomycin showed a cure rate of 8%, linezolid showed a cure rate of 0%, and levofloxacin showed a cure rate of 58%. In addition, daptomycin at a high dose (30 mg/kg) completely prevented the emergence of rifampin resistance in planktonic and adherent MRSA cells. Daptomycin at a high dose, corresponding to 6 mg/kg in humans, in combination with rifampin showed the highest activity against planktonic and adherent MRSA. Daptomycin plus rifampin is a promising treatment option for implant-associated MRSA infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19364845      PMCID: PMC2704655          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00047-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  22 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and inflammatory fluid penetration of intravenous daptomycin in volunteers.

Authors:  R Wise; T Gee; J M Andrews; B Dvorchik; G Marshall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases.

Authors:  Luanne Hall-Stoodley; J William Costerton; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Antimicrobial treatment of orthopedic implant-related infections with rifampin combinations.

Authors:  A F Widmer; A Gaechter; P E Ochsner; W Zimmerli
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  The effect of cultural conditions on the activity of LY146032 against staphylococci and streptococci.

Authors:  J H Andrew; M C Wale; L J Wale; D Greenwood
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Oral treatment of Staphylococcus spp. infected orthopaedic implants with fusidic acid or ofloxacin in combination with rifampicin.

Authors:  M Drancourt; A Stein; J N Argenson; R Roiron; P Groulier; D Raoult
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Management of infection associated with total hip arthroplasty according to a treatment algorithm.

Authors:  S G Giulieri; P Graber; P E Ochsner; W Zimmerli
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Pathogenesis of foreign body infection: description and characteristics of an animal model.

Authors:  W Zimmerli; F A Waldvogel; P Vaudaux; U E Nydegger
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Microbiological tests to predict treatment outcome in experimental device-related infections due to Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  W Zimmerli; R Frei; A F Widmer; Z Rajacic
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Correlation of daptomycin bactericidal activity and membrane depolarization in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jared A Silverman; Nancy G Perlmutter; Howard M Shapiro
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of biofilm-associated cell survival following in vitro exposure of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to the antibiotics clindamycin, daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline and vancomycin.

Authors:  Karen Smith; Ana Perez; Gordon Ramage; Curtis G Gemmell; Sue Lang
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 5.283

View more
  67 in total

1.  Efficacy of usual and high doses of daptomycin in combination with rifampin versus alternative therapies in experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Garrigós; O Murillo; G Euba; R Verdaguer; F Tubau; C Cabellos; J Cabo; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  [Orthopaedic implant-associated infections: Update of antimicrobial therapy].

Authors:  W Zimmerli
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Treatment with linezolid or vancomycin in combination with rifampin is effective in an animal model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus foreign body osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Paschalis Vergidis; Mark S Rouse; Gorane Euba; Melissa J Karau; Suzannah M Schmidt; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The anti-biofilm effect of macrolides in a rat model of S. aureus foreign-body infection: Might it be of clinical relevance?

Authors:  Cristina El Haj; Oscar Murillo; Alba Ribera; Dolors Garcia-Somoza; Fe Tubau; Carmen Cabellos; Javier Cabo; Javier Ariza
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Rifamycins, Alone and in Combination.

Authors:  David M Rothstein
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 6.  Pathogenesis of implant-associated infection: the role of the host.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Parham Sendi
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 7.  Propionibacterium acnes: from commensal to opportunistic biofilm-associated implant pathogen.

Authors:  Yvonne Achermann; Ellie J C Goldstein; Tom Coenye; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  Intracellular Pharmacokinetics of Antibacterials and Their Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Federico Pea
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  High activity of Fosfomycin and Rifampin against methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro and in an experimental foreign-body infection model.

Authors:  Raluca Mihailescu; Ulrika Furustrand Tafin; Stéphane Corvec; Alessandra Oliva; Bertrand Betrisey; Oliver Borens; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Role of Rifampin against Staphylococcal Biofilm Infections In Vitro, in Animal Models, and in Orthopedic-Device-Related Infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Parham Sendi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.