A D Asante1, A B Zwi. 1. School of Public Health and Community Medicine (HRH Hub@UNSW), The University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. a.asante@unsw.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Allocation of financial resources in the health sector is often seen as a formula-driven activity. However, the decision to allocate a certain amount of resources to a particular health jurisdiction or facility may be based on a broader range of factors, sometimes not reflected in the existing resource allocation formula. This study explores the 'other' factors that influence the equity of resource allocation in the health system of Ghana. The extent to which these factors are, or can be, accounted for in the resource allocation process is analysed. STUDY DESIGN: An exploratory design focusing on different levels of the health system and diverse stakeholders. METHODS: Data were gathered through semi-structured qualitative interviews with health authorities at national, regional and district levels, and with donor representatives and local government officials in 2003 and 2004. RESULTS: The availability of human resources for health, local capacity to utilize funds, donor involvement in the health sector, and commitment to promote equity have considerable influence on resource allocation decisions and affect the equity of funding allocations. However, these factors are not accounted for adequately in the resource allocation process. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the need for a more transparent resource allocation system in Ghana based on needs, and takes into account key issues such as capacity constraints, the inequitable human resource distribution and donor-earmarked funding.
OBJECTIVE: Allocation of financial resources in the health sector is often seen as a formula-driven activity. However, the decision to allocate a certain amount of resources to a particular health jurisdiction or facility may be based on a broader range of factors, sometimes not reflected in the existing resource allocation formula. This study explores the 'other' factors that influence the equity of resource allocation in the health system of Ghana. The extent to which these factors are, or can be, accounted for in the resource allocation process is analysed. STUDY DESIGN: An exploratory design focusing on different levels of the health system and diverse stakeholders. METHODS: Data were gathered through semi-structured qualitative interviews with health authorities at national, regional and district levels, and with donor representatives and local government officials in 2003 and 2004. RESULTS: The availability of human resources for health, local capacity to utilize funds, donor involvement in the health sector, and commitment to promote equity have considerable influence on resource allocation decisions and affect the equity of funding allocations. However, these factors are not accounted for adequately in the resource allocation process. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the need for a more transparent resource allocation system in Ghana based on needs, and takes into account key issues such as capacity constraints, the inequitable human resource distribution and donor-earmarked funding.
Authors: Margaret E Kruk; Jennifer C Johnson; Mawuli Gyakobo; Peter Agyei-Baffour; Kwesi Asabir; S Rani Kotha; Janet Kwansah; Emmanuel Nakua; Rachel C Snow; Mawuli Dzodzomenyo Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Lalla Aïda Guindo; Monika Wagner; Rob Baltussen; Donna Rindress; Janine van Til; Paul Kind; Mireille M Goetghebeur Journal: Cost Eff Resour Alloc Date: 2012-07-18
Authors: Martin Nyaaba Adokiya; John Koku Awoonor-Williams; Inuwa Yau Barau; Claudia Beiersmann; Olaf Mueller Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 3.295